Bug#336713: tex-common: prompted about /etc/texmf/updmap.d/00updmap.cfg which I had not changed

To: Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org>
Cc: 336713@bugs.debian.org, Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Bug#336713: tex-common: prompted about /etc/texmf/updmap.d/00updmap.cfg which I had not changed
From: Frank Küster <frank@debian.org>
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2005 10:08:34 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 87irvcybu5.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch>
Reply-to: Frank Küster <frank@debian.org>, 336713@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <E1EWmA7-0000KN-IM@noddy.cloud.net.au> (Hamish Moffatt's message of "Tue, 01 Nov 2005 13:46:11 +1100")
References: <E1EWmA7-0000KN-IM@noddy.cloud.net.au>

Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org> wrote:

> Package: tex-common
> Version: 0.8
> Severity: normal
>
> When tex-common 0.8 was installed during a routing apt-get upgrade, I was 
> asked about my changes to /etc/texmf/updmap.d/00updmap.cfg. I have not
> changed that file and indeed did not know that it existed until now.
>
[...]
> Mysterious conffile changes are one of my least favourite parts of Debian :-|

Same for me...  Thanks for reporting and for the diff.  Can you also
send the md5sum of the old version (the file is ucf-managed)?

Regards, Frank
-- 
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#336713: tex-common: prompted about /etc/texmf/updmap.d/00updmap.cfg which I had not changed
  - From: Frank Küster <frank@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Bug#336714: tetex-base: asked about upgrade of previously non-existent conffile /etc/texdoctk/texdocrc
Next by Date: Bug#336743: doesn't break long \hrefs in DVI while PDF does
Previous by thread: Processed: Re: Bug#336714: tetex-base: asked about upgrade of previously non-existent conffile /etc/texdoctk/texdocrc
Next by thread: Bug#336713: tex-common: prompted about /etc/texmf/updmap.d/00updmap.cfg which I had not changed
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread