Re: teTeX and TeX Live interoperability
- To: debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: teTeX and TeX Live interoperability
- From: Frank Küster <frank@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 17:01:49 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87wtjrujgy.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20051102135612.GB13018@thinkpad> (Ralf Stubner's message of "Wed, 2 Nov 2005 14:56:12 +0100")
- References: <87pspzaqra.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch> <20051024103454.GA22006@memak.tu-darmstadt.de> <873bmrnoav.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch> <20051025091111.GA24197@memak.tu-darmstadt.de> <8764rlsc9i.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch> <87pspzaqra.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch> <20051024103454.GA22006@memak.tu-darmstadt.de> <873bmrnoav.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch> <20051025091111.GA24197@memak.tu-darmstadt.de> <20051027170753.GB31686@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <[🔎] 20051102135612.GB13018@thinkpad>
Ralf Stubner <ralf.stubner@physik.uni-erlangen.de> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 19:07 +0200, Norbert Preining wrote:
>> Some of these packages have already been separated out:
>> . cm-super (me)
>> . texinfo (me)
>> . lmodern (hmm, who?, I guess again I am a candidate, but for now: no)
>
> In principle, I could imagine maintaining lmodern, but right now I have
> to prepare my PhD examination ...
There's no need to hurry. And if Florent comes back healthy and with
multiplied energy, you both will easily find a playground for each...
>> But, for now, I see no possibility of *coexistance* of tetex and texlive
>> on the same system (ie mixing of packages) due to the overlap of
>> packages.
>
> Another, rather radical, approach would be to use separate TEXMF trees,
> ie,
>
> /usr/share/texmf-teTeX for tetex-{base,extra}
> /usr/share/texmf-TeXLive for texlive-{...}
> /usr/share/texmf for *-bin packages (pool files) and
> other packages
>
> That way, /usr/share/texmf would become something like the TEXMFSITE
> mentioned in the policy.
Namewise, I'd rather say /usr/share/texmf is TEXMFMAIN, and
/usr/share/texmf-teTeX is TEXMFDIST_TETEX. There might still be a
problem with the order of trees: In upstream teTex, it is
...,!!$TEXMFMAIN,!!$TEXMFLOCAL,!!$TEXMFDIST
But in order for TEXMFLOCAL to be able to shadow files installed with a
Debian package, either Debian packages have to install in one of the
TEXMFDIST trees, or we must keep on swapping MAIN and LOCAL.
> Of course, the *-bin packages would still have
> to conflict with each other, and one probably has to be careful with
> packags that provide new formats. One would have to decide on the search
> order between texmf-teTeX and texmf-TeXLive. It might be good to have
> that configurable in a simple way.
>
> Of course, this would lead to some files being installed twice. I
> personally could live with that ...
It doesn't sound bad.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Reply to: