Bug#320823: marked as done (tetex-bin: missing manpage: pdftosrc)
Your message dated Tue, 1 Nov 2005 19:19:59 +0100
with message-id <20051101181959.GA3104@preusse>
and subject line Bug#215248: tetex-bin: pdftosrc has no manpage and no doc
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Aug 2005 19:25:30 +0000
>From justinpryzby@users.sourceforge.net Mon Aug 01 12:25:30 2005
Return-path: <justinpryzby@users.sourceforge.net>
Received: from ms-smtp-01.nyroc.rr.com [24.24.2.55]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1Dzfuj-00046s-00; Mon, 01 Aug 2005 12:25:29 -0700
Received: from andromeda (cpe-69-202-136-66.twcny.res.rr.com [69.202.136.66])
by ms-smtp-01.nyroc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j71JPQDX023295
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 1 Aug 2005 15:25:27 -0400 (EDT)
From: justinpryzby@users.sourceforge.net
Received: from pryzbyj by andromeda with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1Dzfug-00019N-00
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 01 Aug 2005 15:25:26 -0400
Resent-From: justinpryzby@users.sourceforge.net
Resent-Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 15:25:26 -0400
Resent-Message-ID: <20050801192526.GC4391@andromeda>
Resent-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 15:01:12 -0400
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: tetex-bin: missing manpage: pdftosrc
Message-ID: <20050801190112.GB3665@andromeda>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: tetex-bin
Severity: normal
Version: 2.0.2-30
File: /usr/bin/pdftosrc
Missing manpage for /usr/bin/pdftosrc.
I take it this is not a piece of software that magically decompiles a
PDF document into whatever source document was used to create it?
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 215248-done) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Nov 2005 19:00:22 +0000
>From hille42@web.de Tue Nov 01 11:00:22 2005
Return-path: <hille42@web.de>
Received: from smtp05.web.de [217.72.192.209]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EX0kO-0003GZ-00; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 10:20:36 -0800
Received: from [212.14.71.206] (helo=preusse.amasol.de)
by smtp05.web.de with asmtp (WEB.DE 4.105 #317)
id 1EX0jt-0000Vs-00
for 215248-done@bugs.debian.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 19:20:05 +0100
Received: by preusse.amasol.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 1 Nov 2005 19:20:00 +0100
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 19:19:59 +0100
From: Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de>
To: 215248-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#215248: tetex-bin: pdftosrc has no manpage and no doc
Message-ID: <20051101181959.GA3104@preusse>
References: <20031011142025.GA906@donald.balu5>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20031011142025.GA906@donald.balu5>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-Operating-System: CYGWIN_NT-5.0 1.5.18(0.132/4/2) i686
X-Face: .n=jHnz:2pu0c0)ef]4O#1FE{Vak?h89!g7_#2+PzSRoIU[pJFNnz>gLhn}UMwv}4/j{X.. 2E+>U>P!`PYk
X-Confirmation-Request: yes
X-Confirm-Reading-To: "Hilmar Preusse" <hille42@web.de>
Sender: hille42@web.de
X-Sender: hille42@web.de
Delivered-To: 215248-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
On 11.10.03 Martin Pitt (martin@piware.de) wrote:
Hi all,
> The program 'pdftosrc' has an interesting name, but no manpage.
> There's no documentation in /usr/share/doc/tetex-bin, it doesn't
> accept -h nor --help and google brings to (popular) hits for
> 'pdftosrc [documentation|man|manpage].
>
Sorry for the late response. teTeX 3.0 has been uploaded to unstable
recently. That version does contain the source code of the program,
but the program is not installed any more:
drachi:[hille] >wget http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/t/tetex-bin/tetex-bin_3.0-10.1_i386.deb
--18:40:57--
18:42:09 (52.40 KB/s) - `tetex-bin_3.0-10.1_i386.deb' saved [3842642/3842642]
drachi:[hille] >dpkg-deb -c tetex-bin_3.0-10.1_i386.deb | grep pdfto
drachi:[hille] >
Now for further explanation: The idea behind the program was to
include the TeX source code into the pdf file as stream object to be
later able to extract the fully functional file. That can be done
actually using the program pdftk (separate package) and the command
unpack_files. The files can be attached using the package attachfile.
Example:
drachi:[t1] >more aa.tex
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{attachfile}
\begin{document}
\attachfile{\jobname.tex}
test
\end{document}
drachi:[t1] >pdflatex aa.tex
This is pdfeTeX, Version 3.14159-1.10b-2.1 (Web2C 7.4.5)
<snip>
Output written on aa.pdf (1 page, 6950 bytes).
Transcript written on aa.log.
drachi:[t1] >ls -l
total 24
-rw-r--r-- 1 hille users 391 Nov 1 19:11 aa.aux
-rw-r--r-- 1 hille users 6905 Nov 1 19:11 aa.log
-rw-r--r-- 1 hille users 0 Nov 1 19:11 aa.out
-rw-r--r-- 1 hille users 6950 Nov 1 19:11 aa.pdf
-rw-r--r-- 1 hille users 111 Nov 1 18:50 aa.tex
drachi:[t1] >mkdir t2
drachi:[t1] >pdftk aa.pdf unpack_files output t2
drachi:[t1] >diff t2/aa.tex aa.tex
1. I used an very old version of attachfile for demonstration, the
syntax may have changed.
2. The package attachfile is actually not contained in teTeX. Feel
free to file a wishlist bug.
Regards,
Hilmar
--
sigmentation fault
Reply to: