Bug#334747: updmap-sys --syncwithtrees
Ralf Stubner <ralf.stubner@web.de> wrote:
> I didn't take lmodern 0.92-9 into account but only thought about
> yesterdays situation. A user who encountered #334658 and did run
[...]
> --edit. That's what I meant with 'back at square one'.
OK, thanks for explaining.
> Now, with the new lmodern in unstable, this can't happen anymore, but
> your second case is still problematic. Maybe the best place to check for
> additional updmap.cfg files would be update-updmap. And since one could
> go around in circles with simply removing additional updmap.cfg files,
> one might have to inform the user about this, present a diff or
> something like this ...
I fully agree. I may implement that in update-updmap as you suggest, if
I don't feel too dizzy (pretty bad night, ugh...).
--
Florent
Reply to: