[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#329189: marked as done (tetex-extra's Type1 fonts don't work when it is installed after tetex-bin)



Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2005 16:33:45 +0200
with message-id <87u0fo15ti.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch>
and subject line Bug#329189: tetex-base: dvips -Poutline not using .pfb fonts
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Sep 2005 09:42:42 +0000
>From aahrend@web.de Tue Sep 20 02:42:42 2005
Return-path: <aahrend@web.de>
Received: from master.debian.org [146.82.138.7] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1EHeeA-0002jL-00; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 02:42:42 -0700
Received: from p508735b3.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([192.168.10.10]) [80.135.53.179] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1EHee3-0001Hk-00; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 04:42:36 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Arne Ahrend <aahrend@web.de>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: tetex-base: dvips -Poutline not using .pfb fonts
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 11:42:32 +0200
X-Debbugs-Cc: aahrend@web.de
Message-Id: <E1EHee3-0001Hk-00@master.debian.org>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
	OUR_MTA_MSGID,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: tetex-base
Version: 2.0.2c-8
Severity: normal



After a fresh install (AMD64) dvips -Pwww or -Poutline would not use the .pfb fonts. However, -Pcmz would.
I believe this is due to missing entries in /var/lib/texmf/dvips/config/psfonts_t1.map. Running updmap manually
once resolves the issue, as does overwriting /var/lib/texmf/dvips/config/psfonts_t1.map with the one from the
i386 distribution.

######################################
 List of ls-R files

-rw-rw-r--  1 root staff 79 Sep 20 00:29 /usr/local/share/texmf/ls-R
-rw-rw-r--  1 root users 742 Sep 20 00:29 /var/lib/texmf/ls-R
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root 29 Sep 13 01:05 /usr/share/texmf/ls-R -> /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXMFMAIN

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-rc1
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages tetex-base depends on:
ii  debconf                       1.4.58     Debian configuration management sy
ii  dpkg                          1.13.11    package maintenance system for Deb
ii  texinfo                       4.7-2.2    Documentation system for on-line i
ii  ucf                           2.001      Update Configuration File: preserv

Versions of packages tetex-base recommends:
pn  tetex-doc                     <none>     (no description available)

Versions of packages tetex-bin depends on:
ii  debconf                1.4.58            Debian configuration management sy
ii  debianutils            2.14.3            Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii  dpkg                   1.13.11           package maintenance system for Deb
ii  ed                     0.2-20            The classic unix line editor
ii  libc6                  2.3.5-6           GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1                1:4.0.1-2         GCC support library
ii  libice6                6.8.2.dfsg.1-6    Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libkpathsea3           2.0.2-31          path search library for teTeX (run
ii  libpaper1              1.1.14-3          Library for handling paper charact
ii  libpng12-0             1.2.8rel-1        PNG library - runtime
ii  libsm6                 6.8.2.dfsg.1-6    X Window System Session Management
ii  libstdc++6             4.0.1-2           The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libt1-5                5.1.0-2           Type 1 font rasterizer library - r
ii  libwww0                5.4.0-9           The W3C WWW library
ii  libx11-6               6.8.2.dfsg.1-6    X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxaw7                6.8.2.dfsg.1-6    X Athena widget set library
ii  libxext6               6.8.2.dfsg.1-6    X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxmu6                6.8.2.dfsg.1-6    X Window System miscellaneous util
ii  libxt6                 6.8.2.dfsg.1-6    X Toolkit Intrinsics
ii  mime-support           3.35-1            MIME files 'mime.types' & 'mailcap
ii  perl                   5.8.7-3           Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 
ii  sed                    4.1.2-8           The GNU sed stream editor
ii  ucf                    2.001             Update Configuration File: preserv
ii  xlibs                  6.8.2.dfsg.1-6    X Window System client libraries m
ii  zlib1g                 1:1.2.2-4.sarge.2 compression library - runtime

Versions of packages tetex-extra depends on:
ii  dpkg                  1.13.11            package maintenance system for Deb
ii  gsfonts               8.14+v8.11+urw-0.2 Fonts for the Ghostscript interpre
ii  tetex-bin             2.0.2-31           The teTeX binary files
ii  ucf                   2.001              Update Configuration File: preserv

-- debconf information excluded

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 329189-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Oct 2005 14:33:49 +0000
>From frank@kuesterei.ch Tue Oct 11 07:33:49 2005
Return-path: <frank@kuesterei.ch>
Received: from idmailgate1.unizh.ch [130.60.127.100] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1EPLCP-0001bX-00; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 07:33:49 -0700
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([130.60.169.166])
	by idmailgate1.unizh.ch (8.13.1/8.13.1/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id j9BEXkbr008918;
	Tue, 11 Oct 2005 16:33:46 +0200
Received: from localhost
	([127.0.0.1] helo=localhost.localdomain ident=frank)
	by localhost.localdomain with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1EPLCM-0004dq-3L; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 16:33:46 +0200
To: Florent Rougon <f.rougon@free.fr>
Cc: 329189-done@bugs.debian.org, Arne Ahrend <aahrend@web.de>
Subject: Re: Bug#329189: tetex-base: dvips -Poutline not using .pfb fonts
X-Attribution: fant
X-Ehrenamt: http://www.langau.de
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 87hdboxkf6.fsf@florent.maison> (Florent Rougon's message of
 "Tue, 11 Oct 2005 15:17:17 +0200")
References: <[🔎] 212698688@web.de> <[🔎] 87fyrc2n8q.fsf@florent.maison>
	<[🔎] 20051008190024.16e6bc84.ahrend@gmx.de>
	<[🔎] 87u0fqtxu0.fsf@florent.maison>
	<[🔎] 20051010214506.416ce902.aahrend@web.de>
	<[🔎] 87hdboxkf6.fsf@florent.maison>
From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Frank_K=FCster?= <frank@debian.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 16:33:45 +0200
Message-ID: <87u0fo15ti.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new
Delivered-To: 329189-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Version: 3.0-7

Florent Rougon <f.rougon@free.fr> wrote:

> Arne Ahrend <aahrend@web.de> wrote:
>
>> By the way, is anybody else able to reproduce this issue by installing
>> the tetex-{base,bin,extra} packages separately one after the other?
>
> Yes. The bug is in tetex-extra.postinst. Insert mktexlsr just before the
> 'if updmap 2>...' and everything will work as expected.
>
> Here is what happens:
[...]

Thanks for the analysis.  The bug doesn't exist in the teTeX-3.0
packages in experimental, and unfortunately it isn't severe enough to
hope to be able to fix it in sarge.  But it deserves an "important",
will set this in a separate mail.

Regards, Frank
--=20
Frank K=FCster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Z=FCrich
Debian Developer



Reply to: