Bug#302035: Splitting the teTeX packages
Ralf Stubner <ralf.stubner@physik.uni-erlangen.de> wrote:
> I think that is the right goal for tetex-base. IMO the easiest way to
> achieve this goal is to reduce the number of fonts in tetex-base. [...]
I agree with you.
> BTW, I just noticed that amsmath (another required part of LaTeX) is in
> tetex-extra, too.
Sending this mail to the bug for proper archiving.
> And /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/dvipdfm/dvipdfm.def
> looks like a part of graphics ...
I don't think so:
%% This is file `dvipdfm.def',
%% and was *not* generated with the docstrip utility.
%%
%% It was hand edited from several docstripped def
%% files that are distributed with the Graphics Bundle
This looks to me as if it was derived from the graphics bundle, but is
not part of it.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Reply to: