[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

package installation fails with teTeX 3.0



Package: xmltex
Version: 1.9-10
Severity: normal

Hi,

Your package fails to install, when one has teTeX 3.0 from
experimental installed:

Setting up xmltex (1.9-10) ...
Replacing config file /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf with new version
texhash: Updating /usr/local/share/texmf/ls-R...
texhash: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXMFMAIN...
texhash: Updating /var/cache/fonts/ls-R...
texhash: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R...
texhash: Done.
Checking for TeX format files  we depend on ... done.
Creating xmltex format files...
ERROR: XMLTeX memory dump (xmltex.efmt) cannot be found
ERROR: PDFXMLTeX memory dump (pdfxmltex.efmt) cannot be found
Trying fmtutil --all
ERROR: XMLTeX memory dump (xmltex.efmt) cannot be found
ERROR: PDFXMLTeX memory dump (pdfxmltex.efmt) cannot be found
*** ERROR: can't make xmltex fmt files, bailing
*** see /tmp/xmltex-postinst.Yt8T9q for details
dpkg: error processing xmltex (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
 xmltex
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

The cause is your code, which checks if the formats have been
created. It assumes (pdf)TeX to generate a file called
(pdf)xmltex.efmt if the e-TeX engine is used. That was changed in
teTeX 3.0 and there exists only (pdf)xmltex.fmt.

root@preusse:/var/lib/texmf/web2c# ls -l *xml*
-rw-r--r--  1 root root 2019449 Sep 16 20:24 pdfxmltex.fmt
-rw-r--r--  1 root root    2266 Sep 16 20:24 pdfxmltex.log
-rw-r--r--  1 root root 2019314 Sep 16 20:24 xmltex.fmt
-rw-r--r--  1 root root    2248 Sep 16 20:24 xmltex.log
root@preusse:/var/lib/texmf/web2c# grep TeX pdfxmltex.log
This is pdfeTeX, Version 3.141592-1.21a-2.2 (Web2C 7.5.4) (format=pdflatex 2005. 9.11)  16 SEP 2005 20:24

This bug will become RC as soon as teTeX 3.0 hits unstable. The
upload will be done as soon as the RMs allow the next big
transition[TM].

Regards,
  Hilmar
-- 
sigmentation fault



Reply to: