[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#138506: marked as done (mozilla-browser: mathml font troubles)



Your message dated Sat, 10 Sep 2005 16:18:08 +0200
with message-id <20050910141808.GD2928@preusse>
and subject line Bug#225004: tetex-extra: Type1 fonts should be in a separate package
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Mar 2002 21:11:51 +0000
>From walterh@gmx.de Fri Mar 15 15:11:51 2002
Return-path: <walterh@gmx.de>
Received: from mailout10.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.21] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 16lyzM-0003eL-00; Fri, 15 Mar 2002 15:11:48 -0600
Received: from fwd00.sul.t-online.de 
	by mailout10.sul.t-online.com with smtp 
	id 16lyej-0006UK-01; Fri, 15 Mar 2002 21:50:29 +0100
Received: from bilbo.local (520016958832-0001@[217.5.30.78]) by fmrl00.sul.t-online.com
	with esmtp id 16lyeT-0r8YxUC; Fri, 15 Mar 2002 21:50:13 +0100
Received: from aragorn.local ([192.168.1.8] ident=mail)
	by bilbo.local with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 16lygk-0001LB-00; Fri, 15 Mar 2002 21:52:34 +0100
Received: from wh by aragorn.local with local (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 16lyeR-0005Ml-00; Fri, 15 Mar 2002 21:50:11 +0100
From: Walter Hofmann <walterh@gmx.de>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: mozilla-browser: mathml font troubles
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.44
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 21:50:11 +0100
Message-Id: <E16lyeR-0005Ml-00@aragorn.local>
X-Sender: 520016958832-0001@t-dialin.net
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: mozilla-browser
Version: 2:0.9.9-1
Severity: normal

Mozilla 0.9.9 comes with MathML. However, some fonts are missing.
The release notes link to a page demonstrating MathML at
  http://www.mozilla.org/projects/mathml/demo/basics.xhtml
Viewing it will give a font warning. Some of the missing fonts 
listed at
  http://www.mozilla.org/projects/mathml/fonts/
are packaged for Debian. In particular, the TeX fonts are in the TeX
packages. However, they do not seem to get installed for use with X11.
Mozilla also complains about missing fonts from Mathematica. The
page above has a link to a download location for them. I could not
find out under what licence they are distributed.



-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux aragorn 2.4.17 #1 Don Dez 27 17:58:41 CET 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE@euro

Versions of packages mozilla-browser depends on:
ii  debconf                       1.0.26     Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6                         2.2.5-3    GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libglib1.2                    1.2.10-4   The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgtk1.2                     1.2.10-9   The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo
ii  libjpeg62                     6b-5       The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG 
ii  libnspr4                      2:0.9.9-1  Netscape Portable Runtime Library
ii  libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2        1:2.95.4-1 The GNU stdc++ library
ii  xlibs                         4.1.0-14   X Window System client libraries
ii  zlib1g                        1:1.1.3-19 compression library - runtime


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 225004-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Sep 2005 14:18:42 +0000
>From hille42@web.de Sat Sep 10 07:18:42 2005
Return-path: <hille42@web.de>
Received: from smtp07.web.de [217.72.192.225] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1EE6Bm-0007dI-00; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 07:18:42 -0700
Received: from [213.6.172.177] (helo=preusse.amasol.de)
	by smtp07.web.de with asmtp (WEB.DE 4.105 #314)
	id 1EE6BG-0007be-00
	for 225004-done@bugs.debian.org; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 16:18:11 +0200
Received: by preusse.amasol.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 10 Sep 2005 16:18:08 +0200
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 16:18:08 +0200
From: Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de>
To: 225004-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#225004: tetex-extra: Type1 fonts should be in a separate package
Message-ID: <20050910141808.GD2928@preusse>
References: <E1AZ2X9-0000HY-00@porton.narod.ru>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <E1AZ2X9-0000HY-00@porton.narod.ru>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-Operating-System: CYGWIN_NT-5.0 1.5.18(0.132/4/2) i686
X-Face: .n=jHnz:2pu0c0)ef]4O#1FE{Vak?h89!g7_#2+PzSRoIU[pJFNnz>gLhn}UMwv}4/j{X.. 2E+>U>P!`PYk
X-Confirmation-Request: yes
X-Confirm-Reading-To: "Hilmar Preusse" <hille42@web.de>
Sender: hille42@web.de
X-Sender: hille42@web.de
Delivered-To: 225004-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
	HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

On 24.12.03 Victor Porton (porton@ex-code.com) wrote:

Hi,

> Type1 fonts (together with corresponding .afm files) contained in
> this package (such as "eufm" font) should be in a separate package
> (tetex-extra-fonts?).
> 
> They are needed independingly of TeX (e.g. for math on the Web in
> MathML format).
> 
This bug (and his brothers) mainly spoke about making the CM fonts
(.pfb and .afm files) of tetex-extra available to XFree and split
them off into a separate package. The reasons are described above.
Meanwhile there exist latex-xft-fonts, which should do the job
independent of teTeX and both browsers suggest the fonts. Therefore I
close the bug.
However me and other people from d-t-maint (thanks to Florent, Frank
and Atsuhito) put some work into #225004 I don't want to throw away.
Hence I posted the latest patch for it into #327480 together with a
TODO list.
I promise I don't have the time to work on this, so don't expect any
further action. Sorry!

Regards,
  Hilmar
-- 
sigmentation fault



Reply to: