On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 03:22:44PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote: > Wolfram Quester <wolfi@mittelerde.physik.uni-konstanz.de> wrote: [...snip...] > > OK, I rebuilt tetex-bin and tetex-base 3.0-7 from experimental, then I > > installed the produced packages. And voilà, I can include png files > > again. From the debugging so far I conclude that this is not a problem > > of the tetex-version and that simply rebuilding the packages in unstable > > would close this bug. > > Can you test this by recompiling 2.0.2-31? Done (tetex-base 2.0.2c-8 and tetex-bin 2.0.2-31). I can still include my pngs. > > > BTW, I noticed that tetex-extra does not include isolatin1.sty anymore. > > Is this intentional? > > Yes, it is obsolete and should no longer be used. Have a look at l2tabu > - when 3.0 is installed, simply "texdoc l2tabu" will bring it up. Thanks for hinting me to this nice document. > > > 3.0-7 is only in experimental for i386 so far, are you interested in the > > ppc packages I built? > > If you personally know a Debian Developer who is willing to upload them > for you, I'd be grateful for this. But I don't think I can upload > package that somebody has compiled on a system I don't know about. OK, sounds reasonable. I'll ask Guido Günther to do the upload. > > > While building, lintian produced some warnings. Should I report them in > > a different bug? > > Yes, please. (Of course I know there are lintian warnings; I just > didn't have enough time to care about this). Will do, after checking the relevance. > > Regards, Frank Thanks, Wolfi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature