Bug#322713: (fwd) Bug#322713: dvipdfm doesn't understand gs anymore

To: Frank Küster <frank@debian.org>
Cc: 322713@bugs.debian.org, Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de>, Shunsaku Hirata <sh74@jcom.home.ne.jp>
Subject: Bug#322713: (fwd) Bug#322713: dvipdfm doesn't understand gs anymore
From: Jin-Hwan Cho <chofchof@ktug.or.kr>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 00:52:58 +0900
Message-id: <14F02167-0B25-4125-BCCD-8753385954CB@ktug.or.kr>
Reply-to: Jin-Hwan Cho <chofchof@ktug.or.kr>, 322713@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <87br3eftmo.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch>
References: <20050823181752.GA1320@preusse> <81D02FC0-E4DC-44C3-9BEC-DDB065BE1EA7@ktug.or.kr> <87br3eftmo.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch>

On Aug 31, 2005, at 4:33 PM, Frank Küster wrote:

The only person who can fix the bug is the author of DVIPDFM.


Of course.  Can dvipdfmx be used as a drop-in-replacement for dvipdfm,
even if you don't process CJK files?  Are there any disadvantages?


Surely DVIPDFMx can do that because DVIPDFMx is an eXtension of DVIPDFM.

If you know any disadvantage, please let me know.

Best, ChoF.

Reply to: