[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#300768: marked as done (cweb: Recommends cannot be fulfilled)



Your message dated Thu, 05 May 2005 18:17:22 -0400
with message-id <E1DToeo-00062T-00@newraff.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#300768: fixed in tetex-bin 2.0.2-29
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Mar 2005 18:07:51 +0000
>From frank@kuesterei.ch Mon Mar 21 10:07:51 2005
Return-path: <frank@kuesterei.ch>
Received: from idmailgate1.unizh.ch [130.60.68.105] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DDRJe-0007IX-00; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 10:07:50 -0800
Received: from alhambra.kuesterei.ch ([130.60.169.112])
	by idmailgate1.unizh.ch (8.12.10/8.12.10/Debian-2) with ESMTP id j2LI7mxW028531
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 19:07:48 +0100
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=alhambra.kuesterei.ch)
	by alhambra.kuesterei.ch with esmtp (Exim 4.44)
	id 1DDRJa-0001mB-9y
	for submit@bugs.debian.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 19:07:47 +0100
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: cweb: Recommends cannot be fulfilled
X-Debbugs-CC: Frank =?iso-8859-1?q?K=FCster?= <frank@debian.org>
X-Attribution: fant
X-Ehrenamt: http://www.langau.de
From: frank@kuesterei.ch (=?iso-8859-1?q?Frank_K=FCster?=)
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 19:07:43 +0100
Message-ID: <87fyyoub2o.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
	X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: cweb
Severity: normal

Hi Julian,

I just noticed that cweb Recommends: tetex-base, tetex-bin ( >> 1.0),
however at least since tetex_2.0.2 we Conflict/Replace/Provide cweb.  Is
this package still usefull as a smaller replacement of tetex if you only
need WEB?  Then you should probably remove those Recommends, or
alternatively we should ensure the packages can coexist somehow.  Or we
remove cweb from the archive, integrating any additional files into
tetex.

What do you think?

Regards, Frank

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27
Locale: LANG=3Dde_DE@euro, LC_CTYPE=3Dde_DE@euro (charmap=3DISO-8859-15)

--=20
Frank K=FCster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Z=FCrich
Debian Developer


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 300768-close) by bugs.debian.org; 5 May 2005 22:20:08 +0000
>From katie@ftp-master.debian.org Thu May 05 15:20:08 2005
Return-path: <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DTohU-0002V6-00; Thu, 05 May 2005 15:20:08 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DToeo-00062T-00; Thu, 05 May 2005 18:17:22 -0400
From: Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org>
To: 300768-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#300768: fixed in tetex-bin 2.0.2-29
Message-Id: <E1DToeo-00062T-00@newraff.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 18:17:22 -0400
Delivered-To: 300768-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: tetex-bin
Source-Version: 2.0.2-29

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tetex-bin, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libkpathsea-dev_2.0.2-29_i386.deb
  to pool/main/t/tetex-bin/libkpathsea-dev_2.0.2-29_i386.deb
libkpathsea3_2.0.2-29_i386.deb
  to pool/main/t/tetex-bin/libkpathsea3_2.0.2-29_i386.deb
tetex-bin_2.0.2-29.diff.gz
  to pool/main/t/tetex-bin/tetex-bin_2.0.2-29.diff.gz
tetex-bin_2.0.2-29.dsc
  to pool/main/t/tetex-bin/tetex-bin_2.0.2-29.dsc
tetex-bin_2.0.2-29_i386.deb
  to pool/main/t/tetex-bin/tetex-bin_2.0.2-29_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 300768@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org> (supplier of updated tetex-bin package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 13:38:16 -0600
Source: tetex-bin
Binary: libkpathsea3 tetex-bin libkpathsea-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.0.2-29
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: teTeX maintainers <debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org>
Description: 
 libkpathsea-dev - path search library for teTeX (devel part)
 libkpathsea3 - path search library for teTeX (runtime part)
 tetex-bin  - The teTeX binary files
Closes: 300768 307816
Changes: 
 tetex-bin (2.0.2-29) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * No longer conflict with new versions of cweb (closes: #300768, #307816)
Files: 
 d2e85186befb021c0cd50ed431086c24 992 tex optional tetex-bin_2.0.2-29.dsc
 4aaeb1eb25949ceeb0293aaf831b70ab 158876 tex optional tetex-bin_2.0.2-29.diff.gz
 16e1d0c0da1f9fabc7ec9c77603b165d 3937594 tex optional tetex-bin_2.0.2-29_i386.deb
 42485f594f7154e7039d17c2f3eb4817 58912 libs optional libkpathsea3_2.0.2-29_i386.deb
 7fb08ef6c4e2970030c3ca83e265feb4 66216 libdevel optional libkpathsea-dev_2.0.2-29_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCepXADU59w/205FkRAlTBAJ9p738t6lqnx1FaNrVIzbV5gcOyrgCfa8mE
alkHF1QVZ8IrMpw8oaNYNms=
=/lle
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: