Re: cygwin: lilypond and tetex-3.0
Frank Küster writes:
> Maybe SYSTEXMF should be renamed to TEXMFSYSFONTS?
>
> Hm, which version of teTeX in Debian do you mean? For the 3.0
> packages, neither TEXMFVAR nor TEXMFSYSVAR will be in TEXMFSYS.
Ah, I see, there were some major changes after 2.99.7 that I haven't
introduced into my texmf.cnf. I did not expect any changes and did
not check for them. I will have a careful look into this.
To be bold, this unbelievable flexibility confuses me. I am wondering
what the plusses are to have a more complex texmf.cnf than say, for
root
CONFIG: /etc/texmf/
STATIC: /usr/share/texmf/
DYNAMIC: /var/lib/texmf/
and for users
FONTS: /var/cache/fonts/
Then duplicate the lot for the user's $HOME directory.
I have not yet, as a packager nor as user, felt the need for much more
than that.
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org
Reply to: