Bug#218105: tetex-base: woeful copyright file

[Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de>]

On 29.10.03 James Troup (james@nocrew.org) wrote:
> frank@kuesterei.ch (Frank K?ster) writes:

Hi,

> > It's common practice for GPL to include only two short paragraphs
> > and refer to the external /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL (perhaps
> > we should add LPPL there, too?). So why not do the same for
> > tetex-base?
> 
> Because the LPPL isn't in base-files.  The common licenses in
> base-files are a speicfic exception to this rule and the LPPL isn't
> one of the common licenses.
> 
As the latest version of the LPPL is considered to be DFSG
compatible: would it make sense to file a wishlist bug against
base-files to include it?

Regards,
  Hilmar
-- 
sigmentation fault