Bug#273176: marked as done (Deps of tetex-doc and tetex-extra)
Your message dated Fri, 24 Sep 2004 12:17:42 -0400
with message-id <E1CAslS-0006BB-00@newraff.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#273176: fixed in tetex-base 2.0.2b-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Sep 2004 12:11:58 +0000
>From hille42@web.de Fri Sep 24 05:11:58 2004
Return-path: <hille42@web.de>
Received: from smtp05.web.de [217.72.192.209]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CAovd-0008NU-00; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 05:11:58 -0700
Received: from [212.14.71.206] (helo=preusse.amasol.de)
by smtp05.web.de with asmtp (WEB.DE 4.101 #44)
id 1CAov9-00083R-00
for submit@bugs.debian.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 14:11:27 +0200
Received: by preusse.amasol.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 24 Sep 2004 14:11:26 +0200
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 14:11:25 +0200
From: Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Deps of tetex-doc and tetex-extra
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20040924121125.GA712@preusse>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-Operating-System: CYGWIN_NT-5.0 1.5.11(0.116/4/2) i686
X-Face: .n=jHnz:2pu0c0)ef]4O#1FE{Vak?h89!g7_#2+PzSRoIU[pJFNnz>gLhn}UMwv}4/j{X.. 2E+>U>P!`PYk
X-Confirmation-Request: yes
X-Confirm-Reading-To: "Hilmar Preusse" <hille42@web.de>
Sender: hille42@web.de
X-Sender: hille42@web.de
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: tetex-doc
Version: 2.0.2b-5
Severity: minor
Hi,
Just have read
http://lintian.debian.org/reports/Tusr-doc-symlink-without-dependency.html
That applies to tetex-extra too. Should be easy to fix. Dunno, if it
would break updates.
H.
--
sigmentation fault
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 273176-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Sep 2004 16:23:02 +0000
>From katie@ftp-master.debian.org Fri Sep 24 09:23:02 2004
Return-path: <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CAsqc-0002Cb-00; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 09:23:02 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CAslS-0006BB-00; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 12:17:42 -0400
From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Frank_K=FCster?= <frank@debian.org>
To: 273176-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.51 $
Subject: Bug#273176: fixed in tetex-base 2.0.2b-6
Message-Id: <E1CAslS-0006BB-00@newraff.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 12:17:42 -0400
Delivered-To: 273176-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 8
Source: tetex-base
Source-Version: 2.0.2b-6
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tetex-base, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
tetex-base_2.0.2b-6.diff.gz
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_2.0.2b-6.diff.gz
tetex-base_2.0.2b-6.dsc
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_2.0.2b-6.dsc
tetex-base_2.0.2b-6_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_2.0.2b-6_all.deb
tetex-doc_2.0.2b-6_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-doc_2.0.2b-6_all.deb
tetex-extra_2.0.2b-6_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-extra_2.0.2b-6_all.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 273176@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Frank Küster <frank@debian.org> (supplier of updated tetex-base package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 17:18:57 +0200
Source: tetex-base
Binary: tetex-extra tetex-doc tetex-base
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0.2b-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: teTeX maintainers <debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Frank Küster <frank@debian.org>
Description:
tetex-base - Basic library files of teTeX
tetex-doc - The documentation component of the Debian teTeX packages
tetex-extra - Additional library files of teTeX
Closes: 269930 271343 271603 271688 271777 272235 272341 273176
Changes:
tetex-base (2.0.2b-6) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Translation update release, should go into sarge, therefore medium
urgency. Additionally addresses an important bug for upgraders from
older sarge/sid versions.
* Force removal of dvipdfm's file diversion of dvipdfm.def, and do no
longer "Replace: dvipdfm", because we only share this diverted
file. Furthermore, the dvipdfm config file is now handled by ucf to
prevent bogus dpkg dialogs.
.
If dpkg cannot remove dvipdfm and gives an error about dpkg-divert,
you ran into an old bug of tetex-base which cannot be fixed
automatically. You have to manually remove the file
/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/graphics/dvipdfm.def in this case.
.
As good as possible, this (closes: #272341) [frank]
.
* Small fixes in the postinst script (closes: #271603)
* Move bsr.map and bsr-interpolated.map back from tetex-base to
tetex-extra (closes: #269930) [frank]
* Move a dangling symlink from TEXMFMAIN to VARTEXMF where its target
now resides (closes: #271688) [frank]
* Let tetex-doc have it's own directory in /usr/share/doc, not just a
symlink to tetex-base, because it does not depend on tetex-base,
thanks to Hille (closes: #273176) [frank]
* Stylistic corrections to the english debconf template, thanks to
Richard Lewis <rtf@jabble.com> [frank].
* Translations:
- updated debconf translations, with many thanks to Javier
Fernández-Sanguino Peña <jfs@computer.org> (spanish), Claus Hindsgaul
<claus_h@image.dk> (danish), Helge Kreutzmann
<kreutzm@itp.uni-hannover.de> (german), Kenshi Muto <kmuto@debian.org>
(japanese), Recai Oktas <roktas@omu.edu.tr> (turkish), Clément Stenac
<zorglub@via.ecp.fr> (french), Josep Monés i Teixidor
<jmones@puntbarra.com> (catalan), Luk Claes <Luk.Claes@UGent.be>
(dutch) (closes: #271343, #271777, #272235). [frank]
- added a brazilian portuguese translation, thanks to Andre Luis Lopes
<andrelop@debian.org>. [frank]
Files:
3b3747259db3498a5e0ada856349a4f1 838 tex optional tetex-base_2.0.2b-6.dsc
cc4724147d40601f9cb0f33ff98e6d0a 149686 tex optional tetex-base_2.0.2b-6.diff.gz
f00c045abf27955ac358c3a29a670a21 14360912 tex optional tetex-base_2.0.2b-6_all.deb
3304add04cdb4a8656880d29e1aa7707 10464688 tex optional tetex-extra_2.0.2b-6_all.deb
59f0f857b3ebc317f95cf0a8cbcc450e 27747336 doc optional tetex-doc_2.0.2b-6_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBVERX+xs9YyJS+hoRAttxAKCZSkUanX5Gh3A2+q77yS0KGFOMhACgjDTJ
+z7/a6o+ES361JhiB1HTM5o=
=8SxC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: