Bug#271464: Suggestion for a better comment in texmf.cnf

[Frank Küster <frank@debian.org>]

Hallo Thomas,

Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de> schrieb:

> On 16.09.04 Frank K?ster (frank@debian.org) wrote:
>
>> However, it could be questioned whether
>> 
>> ,----
>> | % If a change here appears to be ignored, try redumping the format file.
>> `----
>> 
> I'd replace "try redumping the format file" by "call fmtutil --all".
> It is shorter and has a exact message, what to do.
>
> ,----
> | % If changes made in this file (after calling update-texmf) appears to
> | % be ignored, call "fmtutil --all".
> `----

For upstream, that would make:

--- texk/kpathsea/texmf.in.orig Fri Sep 17 12:28:51 2004
+++ texk/kpathsea/texmf.in      Fri Sep 17 12:29:38 2004
@@ -409,7 +409,7 @@
 % variant, the usual dot notation works, e.g.,
 % main_memory.hugetex = 20000000
 % 
-% If a change here appears to be ignored, try redumping the format file.
+% If a change made below appears to be ignored, call "fmtutil --all".
 
 % Memory. Must be less than 8,000,000 total.
 % 

Regards, Frank
-- 
Frank Küster, Biozentrum der Univ. Basel
Abt. Biophysikalische Chemie