Bug#264953: marked as done (tetex-bin unstable: 2.0.2-17: fmtutil.cnf not found)
Your message dated Tue, 17 Aug 2004 10:42:25 +0800
with message-id <20040817024225.GA5941@sjtu.edu.cn>
and subject line 264953 closed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Aug 2004 03:53:46 +0000
>From zch@sjtu.edu.cn Tue Aug 10 20:53:46 2004
Return-path: <zch@sjtu.edu.cn>
Received: from (debian) [202.120.44.62]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BukBN-0007wf-00; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 20:53:46 -0700
Received: from zch by debian with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1BukNj-0001RK-8K; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 12:06:31 +0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Debian User <zch@sjtu.edu.cn>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: tetex-bin unstable: 2.0.2-17: fmtutil.cnf not found
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.64
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 12:06:30 +0800
Message-Id: <[🔎] E1BukNj-0001RK-8K@debian>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: tetex-bin unstable: 2.0.2-17
Version: unstable: 2.0.2-17
Severity: normal
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-1-686
Locale: LANG=zh_CN.gbk, LC_CTYPE=zh_CN.gbk
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 264953-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Aug 2004 02:28:38 +0000
>From zch@sjtu.edu.cn Mon Aug 16 19:28:38 2004
Return-path: <zch@sjtu.edu.cn>
Received: from (debian) [202.120.44.62]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BwtiH-0000u7-00; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 19:28:38 -0700
Received: from zch by debian with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1Bwtvd-0001YG-PA
for 264953-done@bugs.debian.org; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 10:42:25 +0800
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 10:42:25 +0800
To: 264953-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: 264953 closed
Message-ID: <20040817024225.GA5941@sjtu.edu.cn>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040803i
From: Debian User <zch@sjtu.edu.cn>
Delivered-To: 264953-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPAMBUGNUMSUBJ
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
I think maybe due to some unoffice deb package conflict with new version of tetex cause the problem that VARTEXMF removed from TeX search paths, sorry for that.
With regards,
Zhang
Reply to: