Bug#264241: postrm assumes mktexlsr is available
Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de> wrote:
> OK, sorry. We call mktexlsr twice, the second time if it fails the
> first time. I dunno exactly why we do this, but IIRC some things are
> cured, if we call it twice.
If you or anybody don't recall why this is the case (I don't), I think
we should try without (in a package that won't reach sarge). If there
are problems, they'd better be fixed in mktexlsr.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster, Biozentrum der Univ. Basel
Abt. Biophysikalische Chemie
Reply to: