Bug#264043: this issue is not fixed
On 11.08.04 Adrian Bunk (bunk@fs.tum.de) wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 10:30:46AM +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Hi *,
> > However: we're on the way to make rebuilds our packages and to
> > create all 4 format files: latex.fmt, latex.efmt, pdflatex.fmt,
> > pdflatex.efmt^1. That will make jadetex install again, without
> > changing the checkfmt commands. However you should switch to eTeX
> > too. See parts of the patch by Jay.
>
> I'm not the jadetex maintainer.
>
> But this sounds good, and it would also fix #253098 in jadetex
>
I think #253098 is a mixture of different bugs. First they speak
about wrong usage of tail and mktemp not regarding $TMPDIR and later
about the incompatible change in tetex.
> (jadetex could then either switch to E-TeX and depend on tetex-bin
> (>= 2.0.2-17) or stay unchanged and conflict with tetex-bin (=
> 2.0.2-17) ).
>
No, if we create again latex.fmt and pdflatex.fmt that checkfmt
commands from jadetex 3.13-1 will not fail, so we don't have to set
these restrictions.
H.
--
sigmentation fault
Reply to: