Bug#255891: marked as done (tetex-base: [INTL:fr] French debconf templates translation)
Your message dated Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:47:38 -0400
with message-id <E1Bp6lO-0003Bt-00@newraff.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#255891: fixed in tetex-base 2.0.2a-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jun 2004 17:07:19 +0000
>From bubulle@kheops.frmug.org Wed Jun 23 10:07:19 2004
Return-path: <bubulle@kheops.frmug.org>
Received: from lns-th2-5f-81-56-227-253.adsl.proxad.net (kheops.homeunix.org) [81.56.227.253]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BdBDS-0005Ak-00; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 10:07:18 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by kheops.homeunix.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id D932F4052; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 19:06:46 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from kheops.homeunix.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (kheops [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 17129-02; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 19:06:39 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org (mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org [192.168.1.3])
by kheops.homeunix.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id E032C406C; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 19:06:32 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org (Postfix, from userid 7426)
id 7237323293; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 18:26:31 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0396801318=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: tetex-base: [INTL:fr] French debconf templates translation
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.61
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 18:26:31 +0200
Message-Id: <20040623162631.7237323293@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p9 (Debian) at kheops.frmug.org
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug.
--===============0396801318==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Package: tetex-base
Version: 2.0.2-9
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch l10n
Please find attached the french debconf templates update, proofread by the
debian-l10n-french mailing list contributors.
Please, for the next updates you make to this package templates,
consider warning translators before uploading the package and leave
them a delay for translation updates.
"grep Last-Translator debian.po/*po" will give you the needed addresses.
If you already do this, please forget about these remarks, of
course....This message is generic..:-)
Manual PS : the tetex-bin update comes soon but needs a new proofreview....
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.6-1-686
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8)
Versions of packages tetex-base depends on:
ii debconf 1.4.28 Debian configuration management sy
ii dpkg 1.10.22 Package maintenance system for Deb
ii texinfo 4.6-1 Documentation system for on-line i
ii ucf 1.06 Update Configuration File: preserv
-- debconf information excluded
--===============0396801318==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="fr.po"
# translation of fr.po to French
#
# Translators, if you are not familiar with the PO format, gettext
# documentation is worth reading, especially sections dedicated to
# this format, e.g. by running:
# info -n '(gettext)PO Files'
# info -n '(gettext)Header Entry'
#
# Some information specific to po-debconf are available at
# /usr/share/doc/po-debconf/README-trans
# or http://www.debian.org/intl/l10n/po-debconf/README-trans
#
# Developers do not need to manually edit POT or PO files.
# Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org>, 2004.
#
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: tetex-base 2.02-1\n"
"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: \n"
"POT-Creation-Date: 2004-05-08 16:31+0200\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2004-06-23 18:24+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org>\n"
"Language-Team: French <debian-l10n-french@lists.debian.org>\n"
"org>\n"
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
"X-Generator: KBabel 1.3.1\n"
"Plural-Forms: Plural-Forms: nplurals=2; plural=n>1;\n"
#. Description
#: ../templates:4
msgid "Remove old conffiles?"
msgstr "Faut-il supprimer les anciens fichiers de configuration ?"
#. Description
#: ../templates:4
msgid ""
"Old conffiles from a previous version of tetex-base were found. Most of "
"these were map files for dvips and now removed from the upstream source."
msgstr ""
"D'anciens fichiers de configuration d'une version antérieure de tetex-base "
"ont été trouvés. Il s'agit pour l'essentiel de fichiers d'association de "
"polices (« map files ») pour dvips qui sont maintenant supprimés dans les "
"sources amont."
#. Description
#: ../templates:4
#, no-c-format
msgid ""
"If you think you have modified such files, then you may refuse this option "
"and preserve them. You can find the list of such conffiles in /var/lib/dpkg/"
"info/tetex-base.config but, for almost 99% of you, it is strongly "
"recommended to remove these files right now!"
msgstr ""
"Si vous pensez les avoir modifiés, vous pouvez refuser cette option et les "
"conserver. Vous en trouverez la liste dans /var/lib/dpkg/info/tetex-base."
"config. Toutefois, la grande majorité des utilisateurs devraient les "
"supprimer dès maintenant."
#. Description
#: ../templates:15
msgid "Remove old updmap?"
msgstr "Faut-il supprimer l'ancien fichier updmap ?"
#. Description
#: ../templates:15
msgid ""
"tetex-base has found /etc/texmf/dvips/updmap from a previous version of "
"tetex-base. You seem to have modified this file."
msgstr ""
"Un fichier /etc/texmf/dvips/updmap provenant d'une ancienne version de tetex-"
"base a été trouvé. Il semble avoir été modifié."
#. Description
#: ../templates:15
msgid ""
"This script is no longer included in current tetex-base and should not be "
"used. It will be renamed to updmap.postinst-old."
msgstr ""
"Ce script n'est plus inclus dans le paquet actuel et ne devrait pas être "
"utilisé. Il sera renommé en updmap.postinst-old."
#. Description
#: ../templates:15
msgid ""
"Changes like the ones you made to this script should now be made to files "
"in /etc/texmf/updmap.d/, see the manpage for update-updmap."
msgstr ""
"Les changements tels que ceux que vous aviez effectués dans ce script "
"devraient être réalisés dans les fichiers placés dans /etc/texmf/udpmap.c. "
"Veuillez consulter la pade de manuel de update-updmap."
#. Description
#: ../templates:28
msgid "Remove old dat files for texdoctk?"
msgstr "Faut-il supprimer les anciens fichiers de données de texdoctk ?"
#. Description
#: ../templates:28
msgid ""
"Old dat files for texdoctk from a previous version of tetex-base were "
"found. They were texdoc-100.dat, texdoc-102.dat, texdoc-103.dat and they "
"were for texdoctk only in teTeX beta version."
msgstr ""
"Des fichiers de données pour texdoctk, provenant d'une version antérieure de "
"tetex-base, ont été trouvés. Il s'agit de texdoc-100.dat, texdoc-102.dat et "
"texdoc-103.dat. Ils n'étaient fournis que dans des versions beta de teTeX."
#. Description
#: ../templates:28
#, no-c-format
msgid ""
"If you think you have modified such them, then you may refuse this option "
"and preserve them but, for almost 99% of you, it is strongly recommended to "
"remove these files right now!"
msgstr ""
"Si vous pensez les avoir modifiés, vous pouvez refuser cette option et les "
"conserver. Toutefois, la grande majorité des utilisateurs devraient les "
"supprimer dès maintenant."
#~ msgid ""
#~ "Old /etc/texmf/dvips/updmap from a previous version of tetex-base were "
#~ "found. This script was completely rewritten and its behavior was changed "
#~ "essentially from the previous version."
#~ msgstr ""
#~ "Un fichier /etc/texmf/dvips/updmap provenant d'une version antérieure de "
#~ "tetex-base a été trouvé. Ce script a été intégralement ré-écrit et son "
#~ "mode de fonctionnement a radicalement changé par rapport à la version "
#~ "antérieure."
#~ msgid ""
#~ "If you think you have modified this file, then you may refuse this option "
#~ "and preserve it but, for almost 99% of you, it is strongly recommended to "
#~ "remove this file right now!"
#~ msgstr ""
#~ "Si vous pensez l'avoir modifié, vous pouvez refuser cette option et le "
#~ "conserver. Toutefois, pour la quasi-totalité d'entre vous, il est "
#~ "fortement recommandé de le supprimer dès maintenant !"
--===============0396801318==--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 255891-close) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Jul 2004 14:49:51 +0000
>From katie@ftp-master.debian.org Mon Jul 26 07:49:51 2004
Return-path: <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bp6nX-0001dv-00; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 07:49:51 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bp6lO-0003Bt-00; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:47:38 -0400
From: =?utf-8?q?Frank_K=C3=BCster?= <frank@debian.org>
To: 255891-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.51 $
Subject: Bug#255891: fixed in tetex-base 2.0.2a-1
Message-Id: <E1Bp6lO-0003Bt-00@newraff.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:47:38 -0400
Delivered-To: 255891-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 8
Source: tetex-base
Source-Version: 2.0.2a-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tetex-base, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
tetex-base_2.0.2a-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_2.0.2a-1.diff.gz
tetex-base_2.0.2a-1.dsc
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_2.0.2a-1.dsc
tetex-base_2.0.2a-1_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_2.0.2a-1_all.deb
tetex-base_2.0.2a.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_2.0.2a.orig.tar.gz
tetex-doc_2.0.2a-1_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-doc_2.0.2a-1_all.deb
tetex-extra_2.0.2a-1_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-extra_2.0.2a-1_all.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 255891@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Frank Küster <frank@debian.org> (supplier of updated tetex-base package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 19:48:40 +0200
Source: tetex-base
Binary: tetex-extra tetex-doc tetex-base
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0.2a-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: teTeX maintainers <debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Frank Küster <frank@debian.org>
Description:
tetex-base - Basic library files of teTeX
tetex-doc - The documentation component of the Debian teTeX packages
tetex-extra - Additional library files of teTeX
Closes: 139900 175623 176153 177401 182324 186869 219294 223912 245599 251761 255246 255672 255891 256911 258267 259003 261137 261496
Changes:
tetex-base (2.0.2a-1) unstable; urgency=high
.
* Don't rely on /var/lib/texmf/web2c's existense in tetex-extra's
postrm - urgency high because of this bug's severity (Closes:
#261137). [frank]
.
* New upstream tarball: Repacked by the Debian team to remove files with
non-free licenses:
.
- british hyphenation (ukhyphen.tex) - users, please bug the UK-TUG to
resolve this issue! Some of the other hyphenation files mentioned in
#139900 are not contained in 2.0.2 any more, the other were taken
from CTAN (with clarified license). (Closes: #139900)
- Pandora fonts (closes: #175623, #261496)
- psfig.sty (People still using it should consider switching
to the graphics package. As long as this is not done you may use
epsfig.sty from the same package) (closes: #182324)
.
Some files have been updated with now free versions from CTAN:
- russion, swedish, and galician hyphenation patterns (see #139900 and
above)
- g-brief: license clarified, new version from CTAN (europs.sty is
only used if available) (closes: #176153)
- caption.sty and caption2.sty (closes: #251761)
- fancyverb-examples in fvrb-ex.sty (closes: #177401)
.
Wile on the way,
- we removed the obsolete pdfcrypt.sty. PDF encryption is no longer
supported by pdfTeX, please use external tools! (closes: #186869)
- include (now free) cahyph.tex and icehyph.tex in orig.tar.gz
(Closes: #219294, #223912)
- We updated listings.sty which was first deleted from the
orig.tar.gz, then added in diff.gz. But the version we had in
diff.gz had a problematic license, the new one is LPPL. euler.sty
also is in the orig.tar.gz again.
- we included updated kpathsea.{pdf,dvi} in the documentation (fix to
tetex-bin's bug #253958)
[frank] with thanks to Hilmar
.
* Static font map files are no longer treated as conffiles (or with
ucf), but instead are installed as ordinary files under
/usr/share/texmf. Nobody really needs to edit those files (and they
can still be overriden by putting files in /usr/local/share/texmf).
Please refer to README.debian in order to learn how to get rid of the
old files in /etc/texmf/dvips (closes: 259003). [frank]
* Conflict with tetex-bin (<=2.0.2-15) because older versions will fail
to install if ukhyph.tex is missing. [frank]
* Include a correct fancyvrb.ps (in patch-tmp) (Closes: #256911) [frank]
* Use correct name for the tetex-xwarn binary in texfind.pl and
texshow.pl, thanks to Hilmar (closes: #258267) [frank]
* Remove tetex-extra's formats in postrm, also upon upgrade - thanks to
Hilmar (closes: 245599) [frank]
* Translations:
- Updated Danish translation, thanks to Claus Hindsgaul (Closes:
#255246) [frank].
- Updated japanese translation, thanks to Kenshi Muto
<kmuto@debian.org> (closes: #255672) [frank]
- Updated french translation, thanks to Christian Perrier
<bubulle@debian.org> (closes: #255891) [frank]
Files:
ee5da82f65c1ab4e81f3d372d4b5430c 838 tex optional tetex-base_2.0.2a-1.dsc
700087ae24393d5835b4aa0f2c8c6f9f 52770971 tex optional tetex-base_2.0.2a.orig.tar.gz
23f6c3e1e692b4634a53312b518f96ef 139211 tex optional tetex-base_2.0.2a-1.diff.gz
f6983111c081d60d7c79c53783d29e61 14349890 tex optional tetex-base_2.0.2a-1_all.deb
f7227dba70fa04c32afe7c0e6aa6bb07 10466026 tex optional tetex-extra_2.0.2a-1_all.deb
b2c32f1b3dfb93db89b1de88460787de 27779578 doc optional tetex-doc_2.0.2a-1_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBBRWD+xs9YyJS+hoRApaGAKCNEKS6F9QOK/gmmX5dziNhLkGckwCgq7wq
d86Q5mR70HIK1JWuLwsLN1w=
=K9sH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: