Bug#200902: marked as done (tetex-bin: errors on upgrade)
Your message dated Tue, 13 Jul 2004 16:49:40 +0200
with message-id <20040713144940.GD18370@preusse-16223.user.cis.dfn.de>
and subject line Bug#200902: tetex-bin: errors on upgrade
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jul 2003 18:47:51 +0000
>From RossBoylan@stanfordalumni.org Fri Jul 11 13:47:49 2003
Return-path: <RossBoylan@stanfordalumni.org>
Received: from conure.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.54]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19b2vt-0002pF-00; Fri, 11 Jul 2003 13:47:49 -0500
Received: from sdn-ar-008casfrmp020.dialsprint.net ([158.252.215.22] helo=wheat.dslnorthwest.net)
by conure.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1)
id 19b2vr-0005BU-00; Fri, 11 Jul 2003 11:47:47 -0700
Received: from ross by wheat.dslnorthwest.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 19b2vp-00038j-00; Fri, 11 Jul 2003 11:47:45 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
From: Ross Boylan <RossBoylan@stanfordalumni.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
CC: RossBoylan@stanfordalumni.org
Subject: tetex-bin: errors on upgrade
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.18
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 11:47:45 -0700
Message-Id: <E19b2vp-00038j-00@wheat.dslnorthwest.net>
Sender: Ross Boylan <RossBoylan@stanfordalumni.org>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 2.0.2-4.1
Severity: normal
I noticed the following two problems after upgrading to this version
of tetex-bin. I had to removed texdoctk first in order to complete
the installation.
1) The log of installation reports
Installing new version of config file /etc/texmf/texmf.d/95NonPath.cnf
...
Generating /var/lib/texmf/web2c/texmf.cnf ... done
Generating /var/lib/texmf/web2c/fmtutil.cnf ... done
/etc/texmf/updmap.cfg is no longer used and a file generated by .
will be used from now on. Old /etc/texmf/updmap.cfg will be reserved
for your reference.
Regenerating /var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg ... done
Running initex. This may take some time. ...
Error: `tex -ini -jobname=jadetex -progname=jadetex &latex
jadetex.ini' failed
Error: `pdftex -ini -jobname=pdfjadetex -progname=pdfjadetex
&pdflatex pdfjadetex.ini' failed
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/lambda.oft installed.
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/omega.oft installed.
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/amstex.fmt installed.
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/latex.fmt installed.
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/pdflatex.fmt installed.
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/pdftex.fmt installed.
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/tex.fmt installed.
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/cont-en.efmt installed.
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/elatex.efmt installed.
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/etex.efmt installed.
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/mptopdf.efmt installed.
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/pdfelatex.efmt installed.
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/pdfetex.efmt installed.
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/metafun.mem installed.
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/mpost.mem installed.
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/mf.base installed.
###############################################################################
fmtutil: Error! Not all formats have been built successfully.
Visit the log files in directory
/usr/share/texmf/web2c
for details.
###############################################################################
This is a summary of all `failed' messages and warnings:
`tex -ini -jobname=jadetex -progname=jadetex &latex jadetex.ini'
failed
`pdftex -ini -jobname=pdfjadetex -progname=pdfjadetex &pdflatex
pdfjadetex.ini' failed
#####
Failed to generate some FMT so try once again!
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/lambda.oft installed.
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/omega.oft installed.
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/amstex.fmt installed.
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/jadetex.fmt installed.
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/latex.fmt installed.
That was using
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# apt-get -q remove texdoctk
Reading Package Lists...
Building Dependency Tree...
The following packages will be REMOVED:
texdoctk
0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 to remove and 123 not
upgraded.
Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 205kB will be freed.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
Reading changelogs...
(Reading database ... 181897 files and directories currently
installed.)
Removing texdoctk ...
dpkg - warning: while removing texdoctk, directory `/etc/texdoctk' not
empty so not removed.
wheat:/usr/local/rootlog# apt-get -qu install tetex-bin
Reading Package Lists...
Building Dependency Tree...
The following extra packages will be installed:
libkpathsea3 tetex-base
The following packages will be upgraded
libkpathsea3 tetex-base tetex-bin
3 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 120 not
upgraded.
Need to get 0B/17.8MB of archives. After unpacking 12.2MB will be
used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
Reading changelogs...
Preconfiguring packages ...
(Reading database ... 181890 files and directories currently
installed.)
Preparing to replace tetex-bin 1.0.7+20011202-8 (using
.../tetex-bin_2.0.2-4.1_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement tetex-bin ...
Replacing files in old package tetex-base ...
Preparing to replace libkpathsea3 1.0.7+20011202-8 (using
.../libkpathsea3_2.0.2-4.1_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement libkpathsea3 ...
Preparing to replace tetex-base 1.0.2+20011202-3 (using
.../tetex-base_2.0.2-4_all.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement tetex-base ...
Replacing files in old package tetex-extra ...
Setting up libkpathsea3 (2.0.2-4.1) ...
Setting up tetex-base (2.0.2-4) ...
---------------------------------------------------------
2) I can no longer access the texdoctk help. When I try to start it I
get
FATAL ERROR: Couldn't open system-wide default config file texdocrc
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux wheat 2.4.20advncdfs #1 Thu May 15 22:28:21 PDT 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US
Versions of packages tetex-bin depends on:
ii debconf 1.2.35 Debian configuration management sy
ii debianutils 2.5.4 Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii dpkg 1.10.10 Package maintenance system for Deb
ii ed 0.2-20 The classic unix line editor
ii libc6 2.3.1-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libgcc1 1:3.3.1-0pre0 GCC support library
ii libkpathsea3 2.0.2-4.1 shared libkpathsea for teTeX
ii libpng12-0 1.2.5.0-4 PNG library - runtime
ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.1-0pre0 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii libwww0 5.4.0-6 The W3C WWW library
ii libxaw7 4.2.1-6 X Athena widget set library
ii perl 5.8.0-17 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
ii t1lib1 1.3.1-1 Type 1 font rasterizer library - r
ii tetex-base 2.0.2-4 basic teTeX library files
ii xlibs 4.2.1-6 X Window System client libraries
ii zlib1g 1:1.1.4-12 compression library - runtime
-- debconf information:
* tetex-bin/upd_map: true
* tetex-bin/cnf_name:
* tetex-bin/fmtutil: true
tetex-bin/userperm: false
* tetex-bin/texmf: true
* tetex-bin/hyphen:
tetex-bin/oldcfg: true
* tetex-bin/use_debconf: true
* tetex-bin/groupname: users
tetex-bin/groupperm: true
* tetex-bin/lsr-perms: true
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 200902-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jul 2004 14:56:54 +0000
>From hille42@web.de Tue Jul 13 07:56:54 2004
Return-path: <hille42@web.de>
Received: from smtp06.web.de [217.72.192.224]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BkOiE-0006FQ-00; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 07:56:54 -0700
Received: from [145.254.197.224] (helo=preusse-16223.user.cis.dfn.de)
by smtp06.web.de with asmtp (WEB.DE 4.101 #44)
id 1BkOhi-0006kD-00
for 200902-done@bugs.debian.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 16:56:23 +0200
Received: by preusse-16223.user.cis.dfn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 784C4ACF9; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 16:49:40 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 16:49:40 +0200
From: Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de>
To: 200902-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#200902: tetex-bin: errors on upgrade
Message-ID: <20040713144940.GD18370@preusse-16223.user.cis.dfn.de>
References: <E19b2vp-00038j-00@wheat.dslnorthwest.net> <20030713203043.GA24048@preusse-16223.user.cis.dfn.de> <20030716.174038.-432835601.kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp> <20030716111427.GA11807@preusse-16223.user.cis.dfn.de> <20040413152540.GD23987@preusse-16223.user.cis.dfn.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040413152540.GD23987@preusse-16223.user.cis.dfn.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Organization: Hilmar Preusse Inc.
X-Uptime: 15:07:54 up 6:44, 6 users, load average: 1.04, 1.11, 1.37
X-Operating-System: Linux 2.4.26 i686
X-www.distributed.net: OGR-P2: 1 packet (107.34 stats units) [3.23 Mnodes/s]
X-Face: .n=jHnz:2pu0c0)ef]4O#1FE{Vak?h89!g7_#2+PzSRoIU[pJFNnz>gLhn}UMwv}4/j{X.. 2E+>U>P!`PYk
X-Confirmation-Request: yes
X-Confirm-Reading-To: "Hilmar Preusse" <hille42@web.de>
Sender: hille42@web.de
Delivered-To: 200902-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
On 13.04.04 Hilmar Preusse (hille42@web.de) wrote:
> On 16.07.03 Hilmar Preusse (hille42@web.de) wrote:
Hi Ross,
> http://bugs.debian.org/200902
>
> > Unfortunately this was not visible in hier first posting. I propose
> > too, to close that bug.
> >
> This was my last statement in this bug. As I guess, we can't
> further investigate that bug I propose to close it. If you agree:
> Would you be so kind to do so?
>
No reaction from the submitter for 1/4 of a year. Closing. Ross, if
you think that bug is still relevant, please reopen.
H.
--
sigmentation fault
Reply to: