[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#181932: marked as done (tetex-extra: g-brief doesn't work and is possibly non-free)



Your message dated Sun, 27 Jun 2004 20:23:15 +0200
with message-id <20040627182315.GA7139@preusse-16223.user.cis.dfn.de>
and subject line tetex-extra: g-brief doesn't work and is possibly non-free
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Feb 2003 18:25:56 +0000
>From michael@fedrowitz.de Fri Feb 21 12:25:56 2003
Return-path: <michael@fedrowitz.de>
Received: from natsmtp00.webmailer.de (post.webmailer.de) [192.67.198.74] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18mHrt-0000dA-00; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 12:25:54 -0600
Received: from caemlyn.net.dhis.org (A38f5.pppool.de [213.6.56.245])
	by post.webmailer.de (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA01630
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 19:25:51 +0100 (MET)
Received: from michael by caemlyn.net.dhis.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 18mHrp-0000fl-00
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 19:25:49 +0100
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 19:25:49 +0100
From: Michael Fedrowitz <michaelf@debian.org>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: tetex-extra: g-brief doesn't work and is possibly non-free
Message-ID: <20030221182549.GA2445@caemlyn.net.dhis.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
Sender: Michael Fedrowitz <michael@fedrowitz.de>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=4.0
	tests=HAS_PACKAGE,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
	      USER_AGENT_MUTT
	version=2.44
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: tetex-extra
Version: 2.0.1-1
Severity: normal

[Should probably be raised to serious if there are really licensing
issues.]

 Hi,

the g-brief package completely fails to work:

> (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/g-brief/g-brief.cls
> Document Class: g-brief 2002/02/16 v3.0 g-brief class
> (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/letter.cls
> Document Class: letter 1999/04/29 v1.2z Standard LaTeX document class
> (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/size11.clo))
> (/usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/babel/babel.sty
> (/usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/babel/ngermanb.ldf
> (/usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/babel/babel.def)))
> (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/inputenc.sty
> (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/latin9.def))
> (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/misc/marvosym.sty)
> 
> ! Class g-brief Error: Can't load package europs.sty !!!.

This is because europs.sty isn't shipped, presumably because of
licensing issues. Now I was going to suggest to simply comment out or
remove the loading of europs (g-brief works perfectly fine without it,
no idea why it wants it at all), when I noticed this:

%% You are not allowed to change this file.  You may however copy this file
%% to a file with a different name and then change the copy.

which certainly makes fixing this a little difficult. Also I have to
wonder if this sort of thing is really still covered by DFSG 4. But even
if you are willing to accept this, it goes on to say:

%% You are NOT ALLOWED to distribute this file alone.  You are NOT ALLOWED
%% to take money for the distribution or use of this file (or a changed
%% version) except for a nominal charge for copying etc.

I think you'll have a hard time to convince anyone that this is Free... 

If this is really still the license of g-brief it will have to be
removed. Otherwise the licensing information should be updated and the
europs requirement removed.

-Michael

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 181932-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jun 2004 19:19:35 +0000
>From hille42@web.de Sun Jun 27 12:19:35 2004
Return-path: <hille42@web.de>
Received: from smtp08.web.de [217.72.192.226] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BefBf-0001Fa-00; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 12:19:35 -0700
Received: from [80.184.40.138] (helo=preusse-16223.user.cis.dfn.de)
	by smtp08.web.de with asmtp (WEB.DE 4.101 #26)
	id 1BefB9-0004mP-00; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 21:19:04 +0200
Received: by preusse-16223.user.cis.dfn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id F2113B19C; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 20:23:15 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 20:23:15 +0200
From: Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de>
To: Michael Fedrowitz <michaelf@debian.org>
Cc: 181932-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: tetex-extra: g-brief doesn't work and is possibly non-free
Message-ID: <20040627182315.GA7139@preusse-16223.user.cis.dfn.de>
References: <20030221182549.GA2445@caemlyn.net.dhis.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030221182549.GA2445@caemlyn.net.dhis.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Organization: Hilmar Preusse Inc.
X-Uptime: 20:16:23 up  3:09,  4 users,  load average: 1.10, 1.05, 1.01
X-Operating-System: Linux 2.4.26 i686
X-www.distributed.net: OGR-P2: 5 packets (60.79 stats units) [2.91 Mnodes/s]
X-Face: .n=jHnz:2pu0c0)ef]4O#1FE{Vak?h89!g7_#2+PzSRoIU[pJFNnz>gLhn}UMwv}4/j{X.. 2E+>U>P!`PYk
X-Confirmation-Request: yes
X-Confirm-Reading-To: "Hilmar Preusse" <hille42@web.de>
Sender: hille42@web.de
Delivered-To: 181932-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

On 21.02.03 Michael Fedrowitz (michaelf@debian.org) wrote:

> Package: tetex-extra
> Version: 2.0.1-1
> Severity: normal
> 
> [Should probably be raised to serious if there are really licensing
> issues.]
> 
g-brief is neither contained in the tar-ball of Debian nor in the
final Debian-packages.

> > (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/g-brief/g-brief.cls
> > Document Class: g-brief 2002/02/16 v3.0 g-brief class
> > (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/letter.cls
> > Document Class: letter 1999/04/29 v1.2z Standard LaTeX document class
> > (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/size11.clo))
> > (/usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/babel/babel.sty
> > (/usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/babel/ngermanb.ldf
> > (/usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/babel/babel.def)))
> > (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/inputenc.sty
> > (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/latin9.def))
> > (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/misc/marvosym.sty)
> > 
> > ! Class g-brief Error: Can't load package europs.sty !!!.
> 
This bug is IIRC fixed in the latest upstream version.

> If this is really still the license of g-brief it will have to be
> removed. Otherwise the licensing information should be updated and
> the europs requirement removed.
> 
I'll contact again Thomas and Sebastion to reinclude it into teTeX as
IIRC the license was changed.

H.
-- 
sigmentation fault



Reply to: