[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: tetex-base needs a new orig.tar.gz



Frank Küster <frank@debian.org> wrote:

> 2. Re-add files that we have deleted from the upstream tarball, but that
>    are now free

Ad 2.) Re-add files that we have deleted from the upstream tarball, but
   that are now free

- #139900: Contains non-free hyphenation files

  See above under 1.)

- #219573: class a0poster belongs to THIS package, not tetex-src

  Had license problems, now it's free. It is not in tetex-beta. We could
  add the files to the tetex-base tarball, or leave the decision to
  TE. I'd suggest the latter (what if he doesn't include it in
  tetex-3.0?)  and not add it now.

- #176153: g-brief depends on europs.sty which is not included

  requires updating of the g-brief package:

doc/latex/g-brief/
doc/latex/g-brief/g-brief.dvi
doc/latex/g-brief/beispiel.tex
doc/latex/g-brief/beispiel2.tex
tex/latex/g-brief/
tex/latex/g-brief/g-brief2.cls
tex/latex/g-brief/g-brief2.sty
tex/latex/g-brief/g-brief.cls
tex/latex/g-brief/g-brief.sty

- #251761: caption.sty still missing despite license change

  Here we have two options: One is to readd caption.sty as it was, with
  the effect that a) tetex-2.0.2 in Debian behaves as tetex-2.0.2
  elsewhere and b) people that want to use caption.sty should update it
  from CTAN. The other is to add a current caption.sty, with the
  respective (dis)advantages.

  I'm not decided yet, but I'm inclined to vote for the new
  caption.sty. Option 1 would mean adding the following files:

tex/latex/caption/caption.sty
doc/latex/caption/caption.dvi

  Option 2 means adding, from CTAN:

tex/latex/caption/caption.sty
tex/latex/caption/caption2.sty
doc/latex/caption/caption.pdf
doc/latex/caption/caption2.pdf
doc/latex/caption/anleitung.pdf


- #177401: Missing fvrb-ex (fancy verbatim example environments) package

  I think there was some action recently, but cannot find any record of
  it here (offline again). I'm quite sure we can readd them, because I
  have yet deleted them from remove-bad-license-files. 


I suggest adding:

tex/generic/ruhyphen/ruhyphas.tex
tex/generic/ruhyphen/ruhyphzn.tex
tex/generic/hyphen/sehyph.tex
tex/generic/hyphen/cahyph.tex
tex/generic/hyphen/gahyph.tex
doc/latex/g-brief/
doc/latex/g-brief/g-brief.dvi
doc/latex/g-brief/beispiel.tex
doc/latex/g-brief/beispiel2.tex
tex/latex/g-brief/
tex/latex/g-brief/g-brief2.cls
tex/latex/g-brief/g-brief2.sty
tex/latex/g-brief/g-brief.cls
tex/latex/g-brief/g-brief.sty

+ caption files

+ fvrb-ex files

Regards, Frank
-- 
Frank Küster, Biozentrum der Univ. Basel
Abt. Biophysikalische Chemie



Reply to: