[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#244601: tetex-bin: package fails to configure: Error: `mpost -ini -jobname=metafun -progname=mpost metafun.mp' failed



On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 09:30:25AM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Frank Küster <frank@debian.org> wrote:
> > Hm, yes, for upgrades from potato probably. I'm not sure, we'll have to
> > check the potato package and check this. But it seems we need to check
> > this if we missed it upon the potato-to-woody upgrade.
> 
> No, that was a symlink even in potato. I don't know anything about slink
> and earlier (TEXMF must have been in /usr/lib/texmf long ago), but at
> least this is not a transition problem from potato or woody to sarge or
> unstable.
> 
> What strikes me is that you encountered that problem exactly
> now. tetex-bin cannot work properly without proper contents in
> /usr/share/texmf/web2c/, it will at least fail each time postinst is
> called.
> 
> And you said that this machine has been "steadily upgraded since potato"
> - this means that it was first installed with potato?

Yes.

> How long was it, approximately, since the last upgrade before this one
> that caused the error?

I don't recall at this point.

> Could it be that the link got somehow lost, and you created the
> directory /usr/share/texmf/web2c manually, because this solved some
> problems you encountered?

I did not create it manually.

> > Can you point me to where exactly you use this directory-to-symlink
> > migration logic - I guess in one of the preinst scripts?
> 
> It seems we don't need this.

Oh, okay.

> Would you agree that we downgrade the severity of this bug? Your system
> is inconsistent wrt tetex in a way that will stop it working completely;
> and I can see no indication that any recent package of ours has caused
> this. It seems it needs really weird, improbably co-occurrences to
> trigger this, if not manual intervention. On the other hand, you
> encountered the bug, and I trust you to be someone who knows what he's
> doing, especially wrt "manual intervention". So I won't want to change
> anything unless you agree.

Feel free to downgrade it; it doesn't seem to affect all users of the
package.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson                |    Every aristocracy that has ever
Debian GNU/Linux                   |    existed has behaved, in all
branden@debian.org                 |    essential points, exactly like a
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |    small mob.       -- G.K. Chesterton

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: