Bug#179258: marked as done (tetex-extra: does not have algorithm and algorithmic.sty )
Your message dated Mon, 26 Apr 2004 10:44:07 +0200
with message-id <87zn8zt9go.fsf@alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch>
and subject line tetex-extra: does not have algorithm and algorithmic.sty
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Jan 2003 21:02:57 +0000
>From daniel@grante.ufsc.br Fri Jan 31 15:02:57 2003
Return-path: <daniel@grante.ufsc.br>
Received: from angola.grante.ufsc.br [150.162.22.231] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18eiJM-0002oy-00; Fri, 31 Jan 2003 15:02:56 -0600
Received: from daniel by angola.grante.ufsc.br with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 18eiLl-0000ux-00
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 31 Jan 2003 19:05:25 -0200
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: tetex-extra: does not have algorithm and algorithmic.sty
X-Debbugs-CC: Daniel Martins <dmartins@das.ufsc.br>
From: Daniel Martins <dmartins@das.ufsc.br>
Reply-to: Daniel Martins <dmartins@das.ufsc.br>
Message-Id: <E18eiLl-0000ux-00@angola.grante.ufsc.br>
Sender: Daniel Martins <daniel@grante.ufsc.br>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 19:05:25 -0200
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: tetex-extra
Version: 1.0.2+20011202-3
Severity: wishlist
tetex-extra does not have algorithm and algorithmic.sty
I could not find the algorith.sty not the algorithmic.sty packages in
tetex-extra, tetex-base and tetex-bin
I was forced to reintall my computer and now I lack these packages
Daniel
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux angola 2.4.20-686-smp #1 SMP Mon Jan 13 23:06:41 EST 2003 i686 Pentium III (Coppermine) GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
Versions of the packages tetex-extra depends on:
ii dpkg 1.10.9 Package maintenance system for Debian
ii gsfonts 6.0-2.1 Fonts for the ghostscript interpreter
ii tetex-base 1.0.2+20011202-3 basic teTeX library files
ii tetex-bin 1.0.7+20011202-8 teTeX binary files
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 179258-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Apr 2004 08:53:06 +0000
>From frank@kuesterei.ch Mon Apr 26 01:53:06 2004
Return-path: <frank@kuesterei.ch>
Received: from balu1.urz.unibas.ch [131.152.1.51]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BI1rO-00075F-00; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 01:53:06 -0700
Received: from alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch (bioz6-allgem17.bioz.unibas.ch [131.152.17.45])
by balu1.urz.unibas.ch (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i3Q8r36G019345;
Mon, 26 Apr 2004 10:53:03 +0200
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch)
by alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1BI1ih-00036v-00; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 10:44:07 +0200
To: Daniel Martins <daniel@grante.ufsc.br>
Cc: 179258-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: tetex-extra: does not have algorithm and algorithmic.sty
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.33.0404231540310.26656-100000@ns.grante.ufsc.br> (Daniel
Martins's message of "Fri, 23 Apr 2004 15:41:52 -0300 (EST)")
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.33.0404231540310.26656-100000@ns.grante.ufsc.br>
From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Frank_K=FCster?= <frank@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 10:44:07 +0200
Message-ID: <87zn8zt9go.fsf@alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Delivered-To: 179258-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1
Daniel Martins <daniel@grante.ufsc.br> schrieb:
> Yes
>
> you can close the bug.
done
> Are there free alternatives ??
>
> Maybe this informations could be included in the documentation.
A search in the Online CTAN catalogue (http://www.ctan.org/find.html)
gives a couple of hits, some of them with free licenses, and some
included in teTeX (and some for sure false positives).
But since I never used these styles (except for the false positives), or
the algorithm style, I can't tell which should be recommended. If you've
found that out, please submit an other wishlist bug. If it comes with a
ready text, it'l promptly be fixed.
Thank you for your interest in teTeX.
Frank
--=20
Frank K=FCster, Biozentrum der Univ. Basel
Abt. Biophysikalische Chemie
Reply to: