On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 10:59:32PM +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote: > On 20.04.04 Branden Robinson (branden@debian.org) wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 01:12:06PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote: > > Hi Branden, > > > > Does this file exist? > > > > No. > > > > > What is the version of tetex-extra? > > > > necrotic:~# dpkg -l tetex-extra > > Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold > > | Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed > > |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) > > ||/ Name Version Description > > +++-============================================-============================================-======================================================================================================== > > pn tetex-extra <none> (no description available) > > > > tetex-bin only Suggests: tetex-extra, and should not assume its files are > > present. > > > drachi:[tetex] >dpkg-deb -c tetex-extra_2.0.2-5.1_all.deb | grep metafun.mp > -rw-r--r-- root/root 1407 2002-10-30 09:41:44 ./usr/share/texmf/metapost/context/base/metafun.mp > drachi:[tetex] >dpkg-deb -c tetex-base_2.0.2-5.1_all.deb | grep metafun.mp > drachi:[tetex] > > > So then: Where does metafun.mp come from? branden@necrotic:~$ dlocate -S metafun.mp branden@necrotic:~$ locate metafun.mp /usr/share/texmf/metapost/context/metafun.mp branden@necrotic:~$ dpkg -S usr/share/texmf/metapost/context/metafun.mp dpkg: *usr/share/texmf/metapost/context/metafun.mp* not found. I assure you I didn't put that file there myself. > What is the version of tetex-base installed? branden@necrotic:~$ COLUMNS=80 dpkg -l | grep tetex ii tetex-base 2.0.2-6 Basic library files of teTeX iF tetex-bin 2.0.2-12 The teTeX binary files -- G. Branden Robinson | Debian GNU/Linux | Please do not look directly into branden@debian.org | laser with remaining eye. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature