Bug#172910: marked as done (tetex-bin: should check for files that have to be moved before showing debconf notice)
Your message dated Wed, 21 Apr 2004 18:28:54 +0200
with message-id <87n0558fcp.fsf@alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch>
and subject line tetex-bin: should check for files that have to be moved before showing debconf notice
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Dec 2002 13:58:40 +0000
>From arthur@korn.ch Fri Dec 13 07:58:39 2002
Return-path: <arthur@korn.ch>
Received: from dclient217-162-201-247.hispeed.ch (twoflower.prv.korn.ch) [217.162.201.247]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18MqKt-0003Xv-00; Fri, 13 Dec 2002 07:58:39 -0600
Received: from turing.prv.korn.ch (turing.prv.korn.ch [192.168.1.78])
by twoflower.prv.korn.ch (Postfix) with SMTP
id 16D5C5BA52; Fri, 13 Dec 2002 14:58:07 +0100 (CET)
Received: by turing.prv.korn.ch (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 13 Dec 2002 14:58:06 +0100
From: "Arthur Korn" <arthur@korn.ch>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: tetex-bin: should check for files that have to be moved before
showing debconf notice
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.9
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 14:58:06 +0100
Message-Id: <20021213135807.16D5C5BA52@twoflower.prv.korn.ch>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 1.0.7+20021025-5
Severity: minor
Hi
wrt:
* Now debconf would display a remark on the change of
update-texmf because a user should rename his/her own private files in
/etc/texmf/texmf.d/ so that texmf.cnf would be correct. [kohda]
It would be really nice if the priority of this notice were decreased if
there are no user files in /etc/texmf/texmf.d/.
ciao, 2ri
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux turing 2.4.19 #1 Sam Nov 16 16:47:16 CET 2002 i586
Locale: LANG=de_CH, LC_CTYPE=de_CH
Versions of packages tetex-bin depends on:
ii debconf 1.2.19 Debian configuration management sy
ii debianutils 2.0.4 Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii dpkg 1.10.9 Package maintenance system for Deb
ii ed 0.2-19 The classic unix line editor
ii libc6 2.3.1-5 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libkpathsea3 1.0.7+20021025-5 shared libkpathsea for teTeX
ii libpng12-0 1.2.5-7 PNG library - runtime
ii libwww0 5.4.0-5 The W3C WWW library
ii libxaw7 4.2.1-4 X Athena widget set library
ii perl-tk 1:800.024-1.1 Perl module providing the Tk graph
ii t1lib1 1.3.1-1 Type 1 font rasterizer library - r
ii tetex-base 1.0.2+20021025-3 basic teTeX library files
ii xlibs 4.2.1-4 X Window System client libraries
ii zlib1g 1:1.1.4-8 compression library - runtime
-- debconf information excluded
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 172910-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 07:03:17 +0000
>From frank@kuesterei.ch Thu Apr 22 00:03:17 2004
Return-path: <frank@kuesterei.ch>
Received: from balu1.urz.unibas.ch [131.152.1.51]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGYEv-0002gn-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 00:03:17 -0700
Received: from alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch (bioz6-allgem17.bioz.unibas.ch [131.152.17.45])
by balu1.urz.unibas.ch (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i3M73FFq004683;
Thu, 22 Apr 2004 09:03:15 +0200
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch)
by alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1BGKal-0000Lm-00; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 18:28:55 +0200
To: "Arthur Korn" <arthur@korn.ch>
Cc: 172910-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: tetex-bin: should check for files that have to be moved before
showing debconf notice
From: frank@kuesterei.ch (=?iso-8859-1?q?Frank_K=FCster?=)
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 18:28:54 +0200
Message-ID: <87n0558fcp.fsf@alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Delivered-To: 172910-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1
Hi Arthur,
one and a half years ago you reported the following bug to the Debian
BTS:
> wrt:
> * Now debconf would display a remark on the change of
> update-texmf because a user should rename his/her own private files in
> /etc/texmf/texmf.d/ so that texmf.cnf would be correct. [kohda]
>=20
> It would be really nice if the priority of this notice were decreased if
> there are no user files in /etc/texmf/texmf.d/.
This has been fixed in version 2.0.2-4.1, but it was forgotten to close
this bug. I'm doing this now.
Thanks for your interest in the tetex packages, and for your feedback -
and excuse us for not reacting at all in the BTS.
Frank
--=20
Frank K=FCster, Biozentrum der Univ. Basel
Abt. Biophysikalische Chemie
Reply to: