Bug#233886: Bug #233886: Re: tetex-base upgrade from woody pretend I have modified /etc/texmf/mktex.cnf

[Bill Allombert <allomber@math.u-bordeaux.fr>]

On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 04:59:33PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Package: tetex-base
> Version: 2.0.2-5.1
> Severity: important
> 
> Hello TeTeX maintainers,
> 
> When doing a woody to sid upgrade from a clean woody install,
> dpkg tell me I have modified /etc/texmf/mktex.cnf
> This is simply not true and confusing.
> 
> The same happen for
> /etc/texmf/texmf.d/95NonPath.cnf 
> /etc/texmf/texmf.d/05TeXMF.cnf
> /etc/texmf/texmf.d/45TeXinputs.cnf
> /etc/texmf/texmf.d/75DviPS.cnf
> /etc/texmf/texmf.d/85Misc.cnf
> /etc/texmf/dvips/config.ams
> /etc/texmf/dvips/config.cm
> /etc/texmf/dvips/config.amz
> /etc/texmf/dvips/config.cmz
> /etc/texmf/dvips/bsr-interpolated.map
> /etc/texmf/dvips/bsr.map

Hello, I have relaunched my tests and it looks like the problem
was fixed for the files below:

/etc/texmf/texmf.d/95NonPath.cnf
/etc/texmf/texmf.d/05TeXMF.cnf
/etc/texmf/texmf.d/45TeXinputs.cnf
/etc/texmf/texmf.d/75DviPS.cnf
/etc/texmf/texmf.d/85Misc.cnf

On the other hand, I get asked a question by ucf about /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf
while I did not change it.

Cheers,
-- 
Bill. <ballombe@debian.org>

Imagine a large red swirl here.