Bug#278298: marked as done (tetex-bin is affected by CAN-2004-0888)
Your message dated Fri, 31 Dec 2004 15:08:28 -0500
with message-id <20041231200828.GA19021@kitenet.net>
and subject line close
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Oct 2004 23:01:31 +0000
>From bunk@stusta.de Mon Oct 25 16:01:31 2004
Return-path: <bunk@stusta.de>
Received: from mailout.stusta.mhn.de [141.84.69.5]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CMDqF-00027O-00; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:01:31 -0700
Received: (qmail 15296 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2004 23:01:30 -0000
Received: from r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (10.150.63.144)
by mailhub.stusta.mhn.de with SMTP; 25 Oct 2004 23:01:30 -0000
Received: by r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 9AE45B000D; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 01:00:59 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: tetex-bin might be affected by CAN-2004-0889
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 01:00:59 +0200
Message-Id: <20041025230059.9AE45B000D@r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 2.0.2-22
Severity: grave
Tags: security
pdftohtml might be affected by CAN-2004-0889
(integer overflow issues in xpdf).
The code is there, but I haven't checked how it's actually used.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 278298-done) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Dec 2004 20:06:41 +0000
>From joey@kitenet.net Fri Dec 31 12:06:41 2004
Return-path: <joey@kitenet.net>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CkT2n-0005WS-00; Fri, 31 Dec 2004 12:06:41 -0800
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (unknown [66.168.94.144])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD93C17F30
for <278298-done@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 31 Dec 2004 20:06:40 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 89C6C6E645; Fri, 31 Dec 2004 15:08:29 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 15:08:28 -0500
From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
To: 278298-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: close
Message-ID: <20041231200828.GA19021@kitenet.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: 278298-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I'm re-closing this bug as the fixed package is in sarge.
(Re-opening bugs to track security fixes getting into sarge is not
particularly effective, IMHO.)
--=20
see shy jo
--M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFB1bG7d8HHehbQuO8RAgnzAKCgSvnu/5x+nMxlLTVunqODnElG/QCfZfXG
dhWfGmpB5ckJ9DHeQtqUhjY=
=FJ8H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO--
Reply to: