Bug#93699: tetex-doc should include ``Home'' version of Catalogue
- To: 93699@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#93699: tetex-doc should include ``Home'' version of Catalogue
- From: Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de>
- Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 09:48:14 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20041220084814.GC1792@preusse>
- Reply-to: Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de>, 93699@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <87y8h3jte9.fsf@alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch>
- References: <87wu3tvkex.fsf@alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch> <87wu3nt8bh.fsf@alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch> <20041115083017.GF1156@preusse> <87y8h3jte9.fsf@alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch>
On 15.11.04 Frank Küster (frank@debian.org) wrote:
> Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de> wrote:
Hi,
> > Futher the Catalog delivered with teTeX refers to a lot of
> > packages not contained in teTeX. Yes, one could argue, that the
> > links to packages in teTeX should be locally the other could go
> > outside. I guess, we'de have to generate an Debian specific
> > Catalogue, which would be a huge amount of work.
>
> I would also say that this is not necessarily a good idea. I find
> it useful to have links to the current upstream versions, while the
> versions in teTeX are sometimes (well, mostly...) outdated. So we'd
> need an *additional* link, not just change the existing ones, for
> the local files.
>
> > Tagging that bug wontfix for now.
>
> If the submitter does not react in the next couple of days, I'd suggest
> to close it.
>
Time to close?
Hilmar
--
sigmentation fault
Reply to: