[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#271464: marked as done (tetex-bin: add a comment to the top of 95NonPath.cnf)

Your message dated Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:17:20 -0400
with message-id <E1CAWHY-0008In-00@newraff.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#271464: fixed in tetex-bin 2.0.2-22
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Sep 2004 09:58:22 +0000
>From bunk@fs.tum.de Mon Sep 13 02:58:22 2004
Return-path: <bunk@fs.tum.de>
Received: from emailhub.stusta.mhn.de (mailout.stusta.mhn.de) [] 
	by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1C6nbJ-0007wf-00; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 02:58:22 -0700
Received: (qmail 29047 invoked from network); 13 Sep 2004 09:58:20 -0000
Received: from r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (
  by mailhub.stusta.mhn.de with SMTP; 13 Sep 2004 09:58:20 -0000
Received: by r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id E6165AF9C4; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 11:57:41 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: tetex-bin: add a comment to the top of 95NonPath.cnf
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 11:57:38 +0200
Message-Id: <20040913095741.E6165AF9C4@r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25

Package: tetex-bin
Version: 2.0.2-21
Severity: wishlist

I maintain a backport of teTeX to Debian stable, and
Fulko van Westrenen <westrenen@fvw.cistron.nl> sent
me the following wish:

<--  snip  -->

I use LaTeX for about 10 years now and consider it the best text processing
system for anything but plain ascii.

Over the years I had some special requirements for the memory allocation
(e.g. installing fonts, musictex). Since I do that about once every two
years, every time I panic about how to make the changes effective. Can you
please consider to add the instructions to the files in

I added to 95NonPath.cnf:
%RUN fmtutil --all AFTER ANY CHANGE!!!

This line saves me about an hour and a some stress.

<--  snip  -->

This issue is not speific to my backport, and a small comment at
the top of 95NonPath.cnf doesn't sound like a bad idea.

Received: (at 271464-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Sep 2004 16:23:19 +0000
>From katie@ftp-master.debian.org Thu Sep 23 09:23:19 2004
Return-path: <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [] (mail)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CAWNL-0006PP-00; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 09:23:19 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CAWHY-0008In-00; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:17:20 -0400
From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Frank_K=FCster?= <frank@debian.org>
To: 271464-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.51 $
Subject: Bug#271464: fixed in tetex-bin 2.0.2-22
Message-Id: <E1CAWHY-0008In-00@newraff.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:17:20 -0400
Delivered-To: 271464-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3

Source: tetex-bin
Source-Version: 2.0.2-22

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tetex-bin, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

  to pool/main/t/tetex-bin/libkpathsea-dev_2.0.2-22_i386.deb
  to pool/main/t/tetex-bin/libkpathsea3_2.0.2-22_i386.deb
  to pool/main/t/tetex-bin/tetex-bin_2.0.2-22.diff.gz
  to pool/main/t/tetex-bin/tetex-bin_2.0.2-22.dsc
  to pool/main/t/tetex-bin/tetex-bin_2.0.2-22_i386.deb

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 271464@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
Frank Küster <frank@debian.org> (supplier of updated tetex-bin package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)

Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 15:46:52 +0200
Source: tetex-bin
Binary: libkpathsea3 tetex-bin libkpathsea-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.0.2-22
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: teTeX maintainers <debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Frank Küster <frank@debian.org>
 libkpathsea-dev - path search library for teTeX (devel part)
 libkpathsea3 - path search library for teTeX (runtime part)
 tetex-bin  - The teTeX binary files
Closes: 269674 271344 271464 272236 272477
 tetex-bin (2.0.2-22) unstable; urgency=high
   * This release contains the corrected fix to a bug that's at least
     important, if not RC, and lots of translation updates. It should go
     into sarge, therefore the high urgency.
   * Bug #267734 was not really fixed by the last upload because of a typo
     in the postinst script, thanks to Florent Rougon <f.rougon@free.fr>
     (see discussion in debian-tetex-maint with 269416 in the
     subject). [frank]
   * Add an important remark to 95NonPath.cnf (closes: #271464) [frank]
   * Use the correct version number for woody when comparing fmtutil.cnf
   * Fix and document the -s option to texdoc (closes: #272477) [frank].
   * Stylistic corrections to the english debconf template, thanks to
     Richard Lewis <rtf@jabble.com> [frank].
   * Translations:
     - fixed danish debconf translation, thanks to Claus Hindsgaul
       <claus_h@image.dk> (closes: #269674) [frank]
     - updated debconf translations, with many thanks to Javier
       Fernández-Sanguino Peña <jfs@computer.org> (spanish), Helge
       Kreutzmann <kreutzm@itp.uni-hannover.de> (german), Kenshi Muto
       <kmuto@debian.org> (japanese), Andre Luis Lopes
       <andrelop@debian.org> (brazilian portuguese), Recai Oktas
       <roktas@omu.edu.tr> (turkish), Josep Monés i Teixidor
       <jmones@puntbarra.com> (catalan), Christian Perrier
       <bubulle@debian.org> (french), Luk Claes <Luk.Claes@UGent.be>
       (dutch) (closes: #271344, #272236). [frank]
 c4fd9eef851517f2a36d4af6467e2e45 1044 tex optional tetex-bin_2.0.2-22.dsc
 32ae9b5f0b1c24ff8a9c65dba3a97120 113813 tex optional tetex-bin_2.0.2-22.diff.gz
 adcb93e6534fabdce50d49a1ca144e2f 3926894 tex optional tetex-bin_2.0.2-22_i386.deb
 bd8ce4eaf0f9a77e2a650657a1e537b2 57050 libs optional libkpathsea3_2.0.2-22_i386.deb
 60007da5b1a0692c0ca2b39152b5e59a 66234 libdevel optional libkpathsea-dev_2.0.2-22_i386.deb

Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)


Reply to: