Bug#197913: marked as done (jadetex: Instalation fails, reporting as requested)
Your message dated Wed, 22 Sep 2004 16:47:08 +0200
with message-id <87acvipdhv.fsf@alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch>
and subject line Bug#197913: jadetex: Instalation fails, reporting as requeste d
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Jun 2003 14:14:34 +0000
>From mferrari@decidir.net Wed Jun 18 09:14:33 2003
Return-path: <mferrari@decidir.net>
Received: from customer248-17.iplannetworks.net (asterix.decidir.net) [200.69.248.17]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19Sdho-0004p5-00; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 09:14:33 -0500
Received: from martin by asterix.decidir.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 19Sdhm-00053W-00; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 11:14:30 -0300
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Martin Ferrari <mferrari@decidir.net>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: jadetex: Instalation fails, reporting as requested
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10.1
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 11:14:30 -0300
Message-Id: <E19Sdhm-00053W-00@asterix.decidir.net>
Sender: Martin Ferrari <mferrari@decidir.net>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_18
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_18 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: jadetex
Version: 3.12-5
Severity: normal
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Setting up jadetex (3.12-5) ...
mktexlsr: Updating /usr/local/lib/texmf/ls-R...
mktexlsr: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R...
mktexlsr: Updating /var/cache/fonts/ls-R...
mktexlsr: Done.
Checking for TeX memory dumps (.fmt) ...
done.
Creating JadeTeX memory dumps ...
tex: fatal: Could not undump 1 4-byte item(s).
Error: `tex -ini -jobname=jadetex -progname=jadetex &latex jadetex.ini' failed
###############################################################################
fmtutil: Error! Not all formats have been built successfully.
Visit the log files in directory
/usr/share/texmf/web2c
for details.
###############################################################################
This is a summary of all `failed' messages and warnings:
`tex -ini -jobname=jadetex -progname=jadetex &latex jadetex.ini' failed
ERROR: jadetex fmtutil failed
pdftex: fatal: Could not undump 1 4-byte item(s).
Error: `pdftex -ini -jobname=pdfjadetex -progname=pdfjadetex &pdflatex pdfjadetex.ini' failed
###############################################################################
fmtutil: Error! Not all formats have been built successfully.
Visit the log files in directory
/usr/share/texmf/web2c
for details.
###############################################################################
This is a summary of all `failed' messages and warnings:
`pdftex -ini -jobname=pdfjadetex -progname=pdfjadetex &pdflatex pdfjadetex.ini' failed
ERROR: pdfjadetex fmtutil failed
failed.
ERROR: JadeTeX/PDFJadeTeX memory dump not found
This package could not be installed.
Please report this bug; include tetex* package version
numbers and the file /tmp/jadetex-postinst.LueTQH in the bug report.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# dpkg -l tetex\*
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name Version Description
+++-==============-==============-============================================
ii tetex-base 2.0.2-4 basic teTeX library files
ii tetex-bin 2.0.2-4.1 teTeX binary files
un tetex-dev <none> (no description available)
pn tetex-doc <none> (no description available)
pn tetex-eurosym <none> (no description available)
ii tetex-extra 2.0.2-4 extra teTeX library files
un tetex-french <none> (no description available)
un tetex-lib <none> (no description available)
un tetex-nonfree <none> (no description available)
pn tetex-src <none> (no description available)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# cat /tmp/jadetex-postinst.LueTQH
running 'fmtutil --cnffile /etc/texmf/fmt.d/40jadetex.cnf --byfmt jadetex'...
running `tex -ini -jobname=jadetex -progname=jadetex &latex jadetex.ini' ...
This is TeX, Version 3.14159 (Web2C 7.4.5) (INITEX)
ERROR: jadetex fmtutil failed
running 'fmtutil --cnffile /etc/texmf/fmt.d/40jadetex.cnf --byfmt pdfjadetex'...
running `pdftex -ini -jobname=pdfjadetex -progname=pdfjadetex &pdflatex pdfjadetex.ini' ...
This is pdfTeX, Version 3.14159-1.10b (Web2C 7.4.5) (INITEX)
ERROR: pdfjadetex fmtutil failed
failed.
ERROR: JadeTeX/PDFJadeTeX memory dump not found
This package could not be installed.
Please report this bug; include tetex* package version
numbers and the file /tmp/jadetex-postinst.LueTQH in the bug report.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux asterix 2.4.18-686 #1 Sun Apr 14 11:32:47 EST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=es_AR, LC_CTYPE=es_AR
Versions of packages jadetex depends on:
ii debianutils 2.5.2 Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii jade 1.2.1-33 James Clark's DSSSL Engine
ii tetex-bin 2.0.2-4.1 teTeX binary files
ii tetex-extra 2.0.2-4 extra teTeX library files
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 197913-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2004 14:53:21 +0000
>From frank@kuesterei.ch Wed Sep 22 07:53:21 2004
Return-path: <frank@kuesterei.ch>
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.191]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CA8Uj-00074r-00; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 07:53:21 -0700
Received: from [212.227.126.162] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de)
by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
id 1CA8Ui-0003qd-00; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 16:53:20 +0200
Received: from [82.194.101.98] (helo=alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch)
by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
id 1CA8Ug-0001zc-00; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 16:53:20 +0200
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch)
by alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1CA8Ol-0003Sq-00; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 16:47:11 +0200
To: mferrari@decidir.net
Cc: Adam DiCarlo <aph@debian.org>, 197913-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#197913: jadetex: Instalation fails, reporting as requeste d
Sender: frank.kuester@unibas.ch
X-Attribution: fant
X-Ehrenamt: http://www.langau.de
From: frank@kuesterei.ch (=?iso-8859-1?q?Frank_K=FCster?=)
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 0EF8394892B74144ACF999556D1FD6BB017FC913@dexter.decidir.net> (Martin
Ferrari's message of "Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:14:43 -0300")
References: <[🔎] 0EF8394892B74144ACF999556D1FD6BB017FC913@dexter.decidir.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 16:47:08 +0200
Message-ID: <87acvipdhv.fsf@alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:3fc7da83a58b7314ee3070631872032d
Delivered-To: 197913-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Martin Ferrari - DECIDIR Argentina <mferrari@decidir.net> wrote:
> Frank, sorry I didn't answer... I just missed this email...
>
> Well.. this was about Jun-03.. Frankly, I don't remember what happened...
> It was a long time ago :)
Well, but this probably means that it has been resolved, or just
occurred only once, unreproducibly.
I close this bug.
Regards, Frank
--=20
Frank K=FCster, Biozentrum der Univ. Basel
Abt. Biophysikalische Chemie
Reply to: