[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#268426: marked as done (tetex-base: [INTL:da] Updated Danish debconf-translation)



Your message dated Thu, 02 Sep 2004 12:47:34 -0400
with message-id <E1C2ukI-0002Wx-00@newraff.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#268426: fixed in tetex-base 2.0.2b-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Aug 2004 15:07:34 +0000
>From claus_h@image.dk Fri Aug 27 08:07:34 2004
Return-path: <claus_h@image.dk>
Received: from master.debian.org [146.82.138.7] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1C0iKD-0001XO-00; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 08:07:33 -0700
Received: from dh3cp105.kt.dtu.dk ([127.0.0.1]) [192.38.89.105] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1C0iKB-0005x5-00; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 10:07:32 -0500
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0171566574=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Claus Hindsgaul <claus_h@image.dk>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: tetex-base: [INTL:da] Updated Danish debconf-translation
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.64
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 17:09:27 +0200
X-Debbugs-Cc: claus_h@image.dk
Message-Id: <E1C0iKB-0005x5-00@master.debian.org>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
	OUR_MTA_MSGID,SUBJ_HAS_UNIQ_ID,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug.

--===============0171566574==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: tetex-base
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch l10n

Please use the attached updated Danish debconf-po translation
(debian/po/da.po)


-- Package-specific info:

-- System Information:

--===============0171566574==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/x-po; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="tetex-base_2.0.2-9_da.po"

# translation of da.po to Danish
# translation of tetex-base debconf to Danish
# Claus Hindsgaul <claus_h@image.dk>, 2004.
#
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: da\n"
"POT-Creation-Date: 2004-05-08 16:31+0200\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2004-08-27 17:07+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Claus Hindsgaul <claus_h@image.dk>\n"
"Language-Team: Danish <dansk@klid.dk>\n"
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
"X-Generator: KBabel 1.3.1\n"
"Plural-Forms:  nplurals=2; plural=(n != 1);\n"

#. Description
#: ../templates:4
msgid "Remove old conffiles?"
msgstr "Fjern gamle opsætningsfiler?"

#. Description
#: ../templates:4
msgid ""
"Old conffiles from a previous version of tetex-base were found. Most of "
"these were map files for dvips and now removed from the upstream source."
msgstr ""
"Der blev fundet gamle opsætningsfiler fra en tidligere version af tetex-"
"base. De fleste af disse var map-filer til dvips, som nu er fjernet fra "
"originalprogrammet."

#. Description
#: ../templates:4
#, no-c-format
msgid ""
"If you think you have modified such files, then you may refuse this option "
"and preserve them.  You can find the list of such conffiles in /var/lib/dpkg/"
"info/tetex-base.config but, for almost 99% of you, it is strongly "
"recommended to remove these files right now!"
msgstr ""
"Hvis du tror, du har ændret sådanne filer, kan du bevare dem ved at afvise "
"denne valgmulighed. Du finder listen over sådanne opsætningsfiler i filen/"
"var/lib/dpkg/info/tetex-base.config, men det anbefales kraftigt alle andre "
"at fjerne disse filer nu!"

#. Description
#: ../templates:15
msgid "Remove old updmap?"
msgstr "Fjern gammel updmap?"

#. Description
#: ../templates:15
msgid ""
"tetex-base has found /etc/texmf/dvips/updmap from a previous version of "
"tetex-base. You seem to have modified this file."
msgstr "tetex-base har fundet /etc/texmf/dvips/updmap fra en tidligere version af tetex-base. Det lader til at du har ændret denne fil."

#. Description
#: ../templates:15
msgid ""
"This script is no longer included in current tetex-base and should not be "
"used. It will be renamed to updmap.postinst-old."
msgstr ""
"Dette skript er ikke længere med i tetex-base og bør ikke bruges. Det vil "
"blive omdøbt til updmap.postinst-old."

#. Description
#: ../templates:15
msgid ""
"Changes like the ones you made to this script should now be made to files "
"in /etc/texmf/updmap.d/, see the manpage for update-updmap."
msgstr "De ændringer, du har lavet i dette skript bør nu laves i filerne i /etc/texmf/updmap.d/, se update-updmaps manualside."

#. Description
#: ../templates:28
msgid "Remove old dat files for texdoctk?"
msgstr "Fjern gamle dat-filer til texdoctk?"

#. Description
#: ../templates:28
msgid ""
"Old dat files for texdoctk from a previous version of tetex-base were "
"found.  They were texdoc-100.dat, texdoc-102.dat, texdoc-103.dat and they "
"were for texdoctk only in teTeX beta version."
msgstr ""
"Der blev fundet gamle dat-filer til texdoctk fra en tidligere version af "
"tetex-base. De var texdoc-100.dat, texdoc-102.dat, texdoc-103.dat og de var "
"kun til en betaversion af teTeX-texdoctk."

#. Description
#: ../templates:28
#, no-c-format
msgid ""
"If you think you have modified such them, then you may refuse this option "
"and preserve them but, for almost 99% of you, it is strongly recommended to "
"remove these files right now!"
msgstr ""
"Hvis du tror, du har ændret disse filer, kan du bevare dem ved at afvise "
"denne valgmulighed, men det anbefales kraftigt alle andre at fjerne disse "
"filer nu!"

#~ msgid ""
#~ "Old /etc/texmf/dvips/updmap from a previous version of tetex-base were "
#~ "found.  This script was completely rewritten and its behavior was changed "
#~ "essentially from the previous version."
#~ msgstr ""
#~ "Der blev fundet en gammel /etc/texmf/dvips/updmap fra en tidligere "
#~ "version af tetex-base. Dette skript er omskrevet helt og dets opførsel "
#~ "ændret afgørende fra den tidligere version."

#~ msgid ""
#~ "If you think you have modified this file, then you may refuse this option "
#~ "and preserve it but, for almost 99% of you, it is strongly recommended to "
#~ "remove this file right now!"
#~ msgstr ""
#~ "Hvis du tror, du har ændret denne fil, kan du bevare den ved at afvise "
#~ "denne valgmulighed, men det anbefales kraftigt alle andre at fjerne denne "
#~ "fil nu!"


--===============0171566574==--

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 268426-close) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Sep 2004 16:53:26 +0000
>From katie@ftp-master.debian.org Thu Sep 02 09:53:26 2004
Return-path: <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1C2upy-0003jb-00; Thu, 02 Sep 2004 09:53:26 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1C2ukI-0002Wx-00; Thu, 02 Sep 2004 12:47:34 -0400
From: =?utf-8?q?Frank_K=C3=BCster?= <frank@debian.org>
To: 268426-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.51 $
Subject: Bug#268426: fixed in tetex-base 2.0.2b-4
Message-Id: <E1C2ukI-0002Wx-00@newraff.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 12:47:34 -0400
Delivered-To: 268426-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: tetex-base
Source-Version: 2.0.2b-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tetex-base, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

tetex-base_2.0.2b-4.diff.gz
  to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_2.0.2b-4.diff.gz
tetex-base_2.0.2b-4.dsc
  to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_2.0.2b-4.dsc
tetex-base_2.0.2b-4_all.deb
  to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_2.0.2b-4_all.deb
tetex-doc_2.0.2b-4_all.deb
  to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-doc_2.0.2b-4_all.deb
tetex-extra_2.0.2b-4_all.deb
  to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-extra_2.0.2b-4_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 268426@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Frank Küster <frank@debian.org> (supplier of updated tetex-base package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed,  1 Sep 2004 14:42:12 +0200
Source: tetex-base
Binary: tetex-extra tetex-doc tetex-base
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0.2b-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: teTeX maintainers <debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Frank Küster <frank@debian.org>
Description: 
 tetex-base - Basic library files of teTeX
 tetex-doc  - The documentation component of the Debian teTeX packages
 tetex-extra - Additional library files of teTeX
Closes: 268426 269416
Changes: 
 tetex-base (2.0.2b-4) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * Load debconf in tetex-extra's postinst script, fixing a RC bug -
     thanks to Agustin Martin Domingo <agmartin@aq.upm.es> (closes:
     #269416) [frank]
   * Copy the fix to language.dat and texmf.cnf from tetex-bin to
     tetex-base, because upon upgrade, tetex-base is configured first (see
     the misled Followup-for bug in #267299) [frank]
   * Translations:
     - update danish debconf translation, thanks to Claus Hindsgaul
       <claus_h@image.dk> (closes: #268426) [frank]
Files: 
 9d9003c9776fcdb9efc2ae190b0edead 838 tex optional tetex-base_2.0.2b-4.dsc
 77b536cf51b34ca99e08f79009eeeb8b 143775 tex optional tetex-base_2.0.2b-4.diff.gz
 2e0d2c8773607e02903199451fc8d238 14355336 tex optional tetex-base_2.0.2b-4_all.deb
 166dcec5d189f5762a606804452c6521 10464136 tex optional tetex-extra_2.0.2b-4_all.deb
 8b02bdd78f1c6dd4b20ca66b93cd4c6e 27743564 doc optional tetex-doc_2.0.2b-4_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBN0pf+xs9YyJS+hoRAoxrAJ9ndI1eAPlWPLaMC2QQ3kBjs2O50QCeOofV
m5D96Q5Psr0NvG7460DEXS0=
=L4/P
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: