Re: Bug#265743: debian-reference: FTBFS: tetex-bin changes?
- To: 265743@bugs.debian.org, debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org, Kurt Roeckx <Q@ping.be>, "J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)" <fsmla@xinara.org>, jensseidel@users.sf.net, debian-doc@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#265743: debian-reference: FTBFS: tetex-bin changes?
- From: Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de>
- Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 10:32:16 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20040816083216.GA4214@preusse-16223.user.cis.dfn.de>
- Mail-followup-to: 265743@bugs.debian.org, debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org, Kurt Roeckx <Q@ping.be>, "J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)" <fsmla@xinara.org>, jensseidel@users.sf.net, debian-doc@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20040815190923.GA18234@aokiconsulting.com>
- References: <20040814175131.GA15253@ping.be> <20040814210747.GA21869@xinara.org> <[🔎] 20040815190923.GA18234@aokiconsulting.com>
On 15.08.04 Osamu Aoki (osamu@debian.org) wrote:
Hi,
> Sigh :-( I am wondering how TeX/LaTeX folks feel about RC bugs on
> documentation packages due to recent TeX/LaTeX package situation.
> Look at Bug #265247
>
... has nothing to do with the TeX e-TeX migration. Until now I'm not
really sure, about what happened here, cause after unpack a file was
missing, which is part of tetex-bin. The following was a typo in
tetex-base -- unrelated to the migration.
> #265611
>
... has nothing to do with the TeX e-TeX migration. It might be the
other migration: /usr/share/texmf/web2c it not more an ln -s into
/var, but rather an own dir. Doesn't break the autobuilders, as they
assume the default answers and not changed config files.
> #264394
>
Bug is normal. The described file doesn't compile on Knuth TeX
either. No gain if you switch back. The bug is here, that the error
behaviour of e-TeX is wrong.
> #263840
>
Wouldn't have happened, if the user would have taken the default
answer. Doesn't break the auto builders.
Thanks,
Hilmar
--
Most people's favorite way to end a game is by winning.
http://hilmarpreusse.forum-rheinland.de/
Reply to: