Re: tetex-base needs a new orig.tar.gz
On 10.07.04 Frank Küster (frank@debian.org) wrote:
> Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de> wrote:
Hi,
> > And from the diff.gz: listings.sty, euler.dvi.
>
> I used the listings.sty from the current beta, not the one we currently
> have in diff.gz, because ours is in fact non-free:
>
> ,----
> | %% You are not allowed to distribute a modified version
> | %% of the package or lstdrvrs.dtx unless you change the file names and
> | %% provide the original files.
> `----
>
Thomas wrote in the changelog of teTeX-base:
Wed Feb 19 21:41:44 CET 2003
* add package mparhack and jurabib
* listings package is back (license *is* ok!)
Nevertheless I find e.g. in lstmisc.sty:
%% No matter whether you use the package for a commercial or
%% non-commercial document, please send me a copy of the document
%% (.dvi, .ps, .pdf, hardcopy, etc.) to support further
%% development---it is easier to introduce new features or simplify
%% things if I see how the package is used by other people.
and the sentence from above. Are these issues fixed in beta from
CTAN?
H.
--
Alcohol, hashish, prussic acid, strychnine are weak dilutions. The surest
poison is time.
-- Emerson, "Society and Solitude"
http://hilmarpreusse.forum-rheinland.de/
Reply to: