Re: what about tetex-extra.preinst
On 08.04.04 Frank Küster (frank@debian.org) wrote:
> Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de> schrieb:
Hi,
> > drachi:[debian] >rgrep m4 *
> > CVS/Entries:/tetex-preinst.m4/1.1/Tue Feb 19 00:50:28 2002//
> > changelog: * move Build-Depends to Build-Depends-Indep in right place and add m4
> > control:Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (>= 4.1.16), po-debconf, m4, sharutils
> > rules:# m4 -DTETEX_BASE debian/tetex-preinst.m4 > debian/preinst
> > rules:# m4 debian/tetex-preinst.m4 > debian/tetex-extra.preinst
> >
> > Any good reason to keep a B-D on m4 out there?
>
> I don't know. I'm not familiar with that stuff, and simple testing
> isn't possible, because we need flex and bison, which depend on m4.
>
Does tetex-base really has a B-D on flex and bison?
> Should I remove it?
>
Would be great if you could test it in your private pbuilder and
remove it, if the build does not fail.
H.
--
This is the ____LAST time I take travel suggestions from Ray Bradbury!
http://rudi.urz.tu-dresden.de/~hille/
Reply to: