Bug#190721: marked as done (splitting of texdoctk is hosed)
Your message dated Sat, 13 Mar 2004 02:37:18 +0100
with message-id <E1B1y5W-00074I-00@mail.intranet.ssn>
and subject line Regestrierung
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Apr 2003 10:11:12 +0000
>From uzs33d@uni-bonn.de Fri Apr 25 05:11:11 2003
Return-path: <uzs33d@uni-bonn.de>
Received: from mail.stw-bonn.de [131.220.99.37]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 1990Af-000107-00; Fri, 25 Apr 2003 05:11:10 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.stw-bonn.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1D5A632CE
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 25 Apr 2003 12:10:38 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from uni-bonn.de (port-192-168-82-198.dhcp.stw-bonn.de [192.168.82.198])
by mail.stw-bonn.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 281F8627DF
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 25 Apr 2003 10:10:38 +0000 (/etc/localtime)
Message-ID: <3EA9099E.1070601@uni-bonn.de>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 12:10:38 +0200
From: Josh Buhl <uzs33d@uni-bonn.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030327 Debian/1.3-4
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: splitting of texdoctk is hosed
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-12.3 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_UA
autolearn=ham version=2.53
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 2.0.2-3
Severity: normal
Bug # 189341 should *not* be wishlist. texdoctk is *broken* if
tetex-extra is not installed. Isn't that a policy violation?
It totally defeats the purpose of splitting off tetex-extra to save
space if you have to install the whole 39 MB anyway, just to get the
conf file for texdoctk.
Why can't the files /etc/texdoctk/texdocrc and
/etc/texdoctk/texdoctk.dat be put in tetex-base?
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 190721-close) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Mar 2004 01:37:19 +0000
>From Regestrierung@domain.de Fri Mar 12 17:37:19 2004
Return-path: <Regestrierung@domain.de>
Received: from gateway.ssn.at (mail.intranet.ssn) [81.223.55.206]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B1y5X-0001a7-00; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 17:37:19 -0800
Received: from static81-223-147-244.xdsl-line.inode.at ([81.223.147.244] helo=martin-bgwuchit)
by mail.intranet.ssn with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1)
id 1B1y5W-00074I-00
for 190721-close@bugs.debian.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 02:37:18 +0100
From: <Regestrierung@domain.de>
To: <190721-close@bugs.debian.org>
CC:
Subject: Regestrierung
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Message-Id: <E1B1y5W-00074I-00@mail.intranet.ssn>
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 02:37:18 +0100
Delivered-To: 190721-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,NO_REAL_NAME
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12
X-Spam-Level:
Herzlichen Glückwunsch !
Ihre Regestrierung auf www.ianta-ki.de war erfolgreich .
Benützername = Sabine
Passwort = 28142678
Sie können sich ab sofort mit den daten unter www.ianta-ki.de einlggen !
Ihr Webmaster@domain.de
Reply to: