Bug#229725: marked as done (tetex-base: Missing conflicts)
Your message dated Fri, 27 Feb 2004 22:32:12 -0500
with message-id <E1AwvD2-0003VB-00@newraff.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#229725: fixed in tetex-base 2.0.2-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Jan 2004 08:02:27 +0000
>From kreutzm@itp.uni-hannover.de Mon Jan 26 00:02:26 2004
Return-path: <kreutzm@itp.uni-hannover.de>
Received: from mrelay2.uni-hannover.de [130.75.2.5]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Al1hS-0001jl-00; Mon, 26 Jan 2004 00:02:26 -0800
Received: from mail.itp.uni-hannover.de (mail.itp.uni-hannover.de [130.75.25.242])
by mrelay2.uni-hannover.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0Q82IGm025831
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 26 Jan 2004 09:02:20 +0100 (MET)
Received: from arctur.itp.uni-hannover.de (arctur.itp.uni-hannover.de [130.75.25.96])
by mail.itp.uni-hannover.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1783FD17D
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 26 Jan 2004 09:02:11 +0100 (CET)
Received: by arctur.itp.uni-hannover.de (Postfix, from userid 237)
id EB33A6B85; Mon, 26 Jan 2004 09:02:06 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 09:02:06 +0100
From: Helge Kreutzmann <kreutzm@itp.uni-hannover.de>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: tetex-base: Missing conflicts
Message-ID: <20040126080206.GB14828@itp.uni-hannover.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-Public-Key-URL: http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm/data/kreutzm.gpg
X-homepage: http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.37
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_25
X-Spam-Level:
--aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: tetex-base
Version: 1.0.2+20011202-2
Severity: normal
Upgrading tetex-base failed:
versuche =BB/usr/share/texmf/dvips/config=AB zu =FCberschreiben, welches
auch in Paket arabtex ist
(english: trying to overwrite "/usr/share/texmf/dvips/config" which is
also in paket arabtex)
Removing arabtex by hand allowed me to install tetex-base.
I don't have a woody changeroot at hand right now, but the easiest way
to check this would be to creat a woody changeroot, install
tetex+arabtex and upgrade to unstable. If that works, than simply
close this bug (sorry for being unable to test that right now myself).
Btw. installing arabtex afterwards worked flawlessly.
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: alpha
Kernel: Linux sixtyfor 2.4.21-pre1 #1 Don Okt 2 18:27:25 CEST 2003 alpha
Locale: LANG=3Dde_DE@euro, LC_CTYPE=3Dde_DE@euro
Versions of packages tetex-base depends on:
ii dpkg 1.10.18 Package maintenance system for=
Deb
ii texinfo 4.1-2 Documentation system for on-li=
ne i
--=20
Helge Kreutzmann, Dipl.-Phys. Helge.Kreutzmann@itp.uni-hannov=
er.de
gpg signed mail preferred gpg-key: finger kreutzm@rigel.itp.uni-hannov=
er.de
64bit GNU powered http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreu=
tzm
Help keep free software "libre": http://www.freepatents.org/
--aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQFAFMl+RsxcY/MYpWoRAuwzAJ9xvzpu0mQJE8u1Jt+eV5mm8zbutgCeJpGZ
+KTCodzfgilA8ZD/iEbsqks=
=avJK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 229725-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Feb 2004 03:38:03 +0000
>From katie@ftp-master.debian.org Fri Feb 27 19:38:03 2004
Return-path: <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AwvIh-0005jX-00; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 19:38:03 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AwvD2-0003VB-00; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 22:32:12 -0500
From: Atsuhito KOHDA <kohda@debian.org>
To: 229725-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.44 $
Subject: Bug#229725: fixed in tetex-base 2.0.2-6
Message-Id: <E1AwvD2-0003VB-00@newraff.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 22:32:12 -0500
Delivered-To: 229725-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_27
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_27
X-Spam-Level:
Source: tetex-base
Source-Version: 2.0.2-6
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tetex-base, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
tetex-base_2.0.2-6.diff.gz
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_2.0.2-6.diff.gz
tetex-base_2.0.2-6.dsc
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_2.0.2-6.dsc
tetex-base_2.0.2-6_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_2.0.2-6_all.deb
tetex-doc_2.0.2-6_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-doc_2.0.2-6_all.deb
tetex-extra_2.0.2-6_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-extra_2.0.2-6_all.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 229725@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Atsuhito KOHDA <kohda@debian.org> (supplier of updated tetex-base package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 23:35:48 +0900
Source: tetex-base
Binary: tetex-extra tetex-doc tetex-base
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0.2-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: teTeX maintainers <debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Atsuhito KOHDA <kohda@debian.org>
Description:
tetex-base - Basic library files of teTeX
tetex-doc - The documentation component of the Debian teTeX packages
tetex-extra - Additional library files of teTeX
Closes: 229725 232870
Changes:
tetex-base (2.0.2-6) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Cleaned up a bit; suggested by Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de> [kohda]
- removed debian/ttlkeys.def which was not used any more.
- removed surplus marvosym.pfb from tetex-doc but this caused duplicated
marvosym.pfb in tetex-base so we removed (possibly) unnecessary
/usr/share/doc/texmf/fonts/marvosym/marvosym.pfb with rules.
* Added arabtex (<= 3.10-5) to Conflicts: entry. (Closes: #229725) [kohda]
* Refined a test for TEXMFMAIN in postinst suggested by Florent Rougon
<f.rougon@free.fr>. Thanks to Florent Rougon. [kohda]
* Removed language.dat handling from postinst for our new mechanism
suggested by Frank Küster <frank@kuesterei.ch>. Now language.dat
would be handled with tetex-bin only. Thanks to Frank Küster. [kohda]
- Also we modified prerm of tetex-base with a patch by Frank.
* Run "debconf-updatepo" which I forgot to run. [kohda]
* Fixed control file. Thanks to Florent Rougon, Frank Küster and Hilmar
Preusse. [kohda]
- tetex-base: removed Replace: tetex-bin (<< 2.0.2-2) because there was
Conflicts: tetex-bin (<= 2.0.2-3) already.
- tetex-extra: removed Replaces: tetex-base (<< 2.0-2) and added
Conflicts: tetex-base (<< 2.0-2) which should be correct relation.
- tetex-doc: removed Replaces: tetex-extra (<< 2.0) and added
Conflicts: tetex-extra (<< 2.0) in the same reason as above.
* Included da.po by Claus Hindsgaul <claus_h@image.dk>. Thanks to
Claus Hindsgaul. [kohda] (Closes: #232870)
Files:
ba33f41a03dbaba31707af885027a7fe 816 tex optional tetex-base_2.0.2-6.dsc
7cae952486aea7fd270c2168070fb2c0 134174 tex optional tetex-base_2.0.2-6.diff.gz
62291b3c1bd889e2a0bf25f2768c956b 14003078 tex optional tetex-base_2.0.2-6_all.deb
3155f77285bfc35de0e0ef9dee0f3959 10516520 tex optional tetex-extra_2.0.2-6_all.deb
1746fab0746eaad700e105d307ca459c 27466200 doc optional tetex-doc_2.0.2-6_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAP19Z1IXdL1v6kOwRAk5GAJ9gygWkW+qer1NUNMcqyel6WhVioQCfTh5d
SgvnO88DdCTswuL3GSTMu+I=
=wmP2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: