Bug#232725: marked as done (tetex-bin fails installation due to xdvi configuration)
Your message dated Mon, 16 Feb 2004 00:58:09 -0800
with message-id <20040216085809.GA31264@net-ronin.org>
and subject line (no subject)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Feb 2004 01:02:12 +0000
>From ramune@net-ronin.org Sat Feb 14 17:02:12 2004
Return-path: <ramune@net-ronin.org>
Received: from d64-180-152-77.bchsia.telus.net (antichrist) [64.180.152.77] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AsAfj-0006Qm-00; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 17:02:12 -0800
Received: by antichrist (Postfix, from userid 1003)
id A5D1A41ED; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 16:58:05 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 16:58:05 -0800
From: carbonated beverage <ramune@net-ronin.org>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: tetex-bin fails installation due to xdvi configuration
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20040215005805.GC19438@net-ronin.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_12
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_12
X-Spam-Level:
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 2.0.2-5
testing distribution, Sparc, Ultra 5
tetex-bin doesn't finish the post-install step correctly as
it can't find the /etc/X11/app-default/XDvi file.
Doing a 'touch' and creating an empty one got it to successfully
install.
When the failure occurs (was upgrading from stable->testing), the
ps output shows dialog being called to inform the user, but no
dialog box was visible on the root console. Hitting 'return',
though, did select whatever the button on the box was and
abort the process.
-- DN
Daniel
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 232725-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Feb 2004 09:02:24 +0000
>From ramune@net-ronin.org Mon Feb 16 01:02:24 2004
Return-path: <ramune@net-ronin.org>
Received: from d64-180-152-77.bchsia.telus.net (antichrist) [64.180.152.77] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Asee0-0001ag-00; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 01:02:24 -0800
Received: by antichrist (Postfix, from userid 1003)
id E367841ED; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 00:58:09 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 00:58:09 -0800
From: carbonated beverage <ramune@net-ronin.org>
To: 232725-done@bugs.debian.org
Message-ID: <20040216085809.GA31264@net-ronin.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Delivered-To: 232725-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_12
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_12
X-Spam-Level:
Reply to: