[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#213310: tetex-base: the dvips database should not be in /etc



From: Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de>
Subject: Bug#213310: tetex-base: the dvips database should not be in /etc
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 00:01:05 +0100

> I've attached two patches: The first implements my idea of generating
> these files below /var/lib/texmf/web2c/. The second makes sure I
> don't try to grep through dead softlinks during postrm.
> The only problem lost: We have changed the behaviour in out postinst.
> How about other packages, using that mechanism? Everytime, we change
> something like that, we have to inform all of them about that and
> file a bug. Therefore I wouldn't do these things quite often and
> don't like my solution. Are there still packages, which try to call
> /etc/texmf/dvips/updmap?
> If we change it that way, we should leave a note in Readme.Debian and
> maybe even in the manpage of updmap.

I guess an idea is certainly good, but I feel you are nervous 
about effect of our change to other related packages, right?

In case of update-texmf, 1 or 2 maintainers of other
packages attended in the discussion from the beginning
and I filed bugs to some other packages afterwards, if I 
remembered correctly.

# Perhaps packages which get effect will be very few.

Regards,		 2003-11-21(Fri)

-- 
 Debian Developer & Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian
 Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@debian.org>
 Department of Math., Univ. of Tokushima



Reply to: