[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#131336: further info



> (FWIW, I didn't see this bug before - I only recently subscribed to
> debian-tetex-maint, and had never seen any bug reports from Debian
> before. They never seemed to get reported upstream.)

And I don't think I got your mail, which is odd.  The Debian BTS
works very reliably in my experience.

Aha, maybe the difference is that I am using PK fonts generated with
mfmode=ricoh (i.e., localfont := ricoh; at the end of my modes.mf).
What mode are you using when you compare T1 with no-T1 renderings?

Here is detailed information and attached files including screendumps
so you can see what I'm talking about.

So:

    [beth] swift> xdvi.bin -version
    xdvik version 22.40v
    Copyright (C) 1990-2002 Paul Vojta and others.
    Primary author of Xdvi: Paul Vojta;
    Xdvik maintainers: Nicolai Langfeldt, Stefan Ulrich
    Please send bug reports, feature requests etc. to one of:
       http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=23164&atid=377580
       tex-k@tug.org (http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-k)

    xdvi itself is licensed under the X Consortium license. Xdvik relies on
    - The kpathsea library which is covered by the GNU LIBRARY General
      Public License (see COPYING.LIB for full details)
    - libwww which is copyrighted by the World Wide Web Consortium and CERN
      (see COPYRIGH for full details).
    - t1lib which is (C) Rainer Menzner and licensed under the GNU LIBRARY
      General Public License but are in part (C) Adobe Systems Inc., IBM
      and the X11-consortium.
    There is NO WARRANTY of anything.

    [beth] swift> 


Not sure I need all these:

                        1         Bitmaps
                        2         DVI translation
                        4         PK fonts
                        8         Batch mode: Exit after reading the DVI file
                        32        File opening
                        64        Interaction with the PostScript interpreter
                        65536     T1 lib
                        131072    More verbose T1 lib messages

sum is 196719

Test file test.tex as in previous email.

Ran the following commands.  Modified my texmf.cnf to use only
standard Debian teTeX source trees

    latex test
    xdvi -not1lib -debug 196719 test.dvi &> test-without-t1.xdvi-log
    xdvi -debug 196719 test.dvi &> test-with-t1.xdvi-log
    xdvi test.dvi &
    xdvi -not1lib test.dvi &
    xwd -out test-with-t1.xwd
    xwd -out test-without-t1.xwd


Attached tarball testdvi.tgz expands into ./testdvi and contains:

 drwxrwxr-x   swift/swift         0 testdvi/
 -rw-rw-r--   swift/swift       272 testdvi/test.dvi
 -rw-rw-r--   swift/swift      1795 testdvi/test.log
 -rw-rw-r--   swift/swift     19460 testdvi/test-without-t1.xdvi-log
 -rw-rw-r--   swift/swift    353107 testdvi/test-without-t1.xwd
 -rw-rw-r--   swift/swift    194683 testdvi/test-with-t1.xdvi-log
 -rw-rw-r--   swift/swift    235307 testdvi/test-with-t1.xwd

The .xwd files are screen dumps made with xwd.  The difference is
obvious: the T1 renderings are spidery.


Attachment: testdvi.tgz
Description: GNU Unix tar archive


Reply to: