[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#195851: tetex-extra: install of tetex-extra failes with unmet dependancies



Package: tetex-extra
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-06-03
Severity: important
Tags: sid



-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: powerpc
Kernel: Linux dopey 2.2.20-pmac #1 Thu Mar 21 17:08:23 EST 2002 ppc
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

I think this is a versioning problem, tetex-extra seems to depend on an
earler version of tetex-base amd tetex-bin than is available.
The following shows 2 attempts to install the package, and the errors that
result.

dopey:~# apt-get install tetex-extra
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.

Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
that package should be filed.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
tetex-extra: Depends: tetex-bin (> 2.0.2-3) but it is not going to be installed
E: Broken packages

dopey:~# apt-get install tetex-bin tetex-extra
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
tetex-bin: Depends: tetex-base (> 2.0.1-3) but it is not going to be installed tetex-extra: Depends: tetex-base (>= 2.0) but it is not going to be installed
              Depends: tetex-bin (> 2.0.2-3) but 2.0.2-3 is to be installed
E: Broken packages

_________________________________________________________________





Reply to: