[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#171344: xdvi sometimes uses wrong-size bitmaps



Scripsit Stefan Ulrich
> Henning Makholm <henning@makholm.net> writes:

> > I have observed this phenomenon as well. Some experimenting shows me
> > that it is probably not T1 encoding that triggers the bug, but the
> > use of scaleable PostScript fonts.

> This is a known bug in versions 22.38 - 22.40f:
> which has been fixed in 22.40g, over a year ago.

Ok. There seems to be a newer package in the Debian pipeline, which is
currently being held back by build problems for other parts of teTeX.

> > More data: The problem is not restricted to small caps. It surfaced
> > for me in a document where xdvi insists on rendering \footnotesize
> > text with \normalsize bitmaps (but still the correct \footnotesize
> > spacing).

> I can't reproduce this one; do you have sample for that? It
> doesn't sound as if it was the same bug ...

I finally managed to produce a minimized example of this. It looks
very much as if it is indeed the same bug as with small caps; it only
shows up if there is *also* small-caps text somewhere in the dvi
file. But FYI, here are files that provoke it:

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{charter}
\begin{document}
\shipout\hbox{normalsize {\footnotesize footnotesize} \textsc{Small caps}}
\end{document}

begin 644 foo.dvi
M]P(!@Y+`'#L``````^@;(%1E6"!O=71P=70@,C`P,RXP-2XR-3HQ-C0UBP``
M``$```````````````````````````````````````````````#_____GP=F
M9/,.GN2U0P`*````"@````9B8VAR-W2Y;F]R;6%L<VEZ998"QZ?S#Y[DM4,`
M"`````H````&8F-H<C=TNF9O;W1N;W1E<VEZ99/S$`,&8XP`"@````H````'
M8F-H<F,W=+M3;6%L;)-CD-F@87!SC/@````J`8.2P!P[``````/H``=\'P"3
ML)@````!\Q`#!F.,``H````*````!V)C:')C-W3S#Y[DM4,`"`````H````&
F8F-H<C=T\PZ>Y+5#``H````*````!F)C:'(W=/D```#*`M_?W]\`
`
end

> > I use tetex-bin version 1.0.7+20011202-8

> Unfortunately that tells me nothing about the xdvik version
> used ...

I didn't count on the upstream authors monitoring the Debian BTS.
It turns out to be 22.40f

-- 
Henning Makholm               "... not one has been remembered from the time
                         when the author studied freshman physics. Quite the
            contrary: he merely remembers that such and such is true, and to
          explain it he invents a demonstration at the moment it is needed."



Reply to: