[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#189341: marked as done (tetex-bin: texdoctk not packaged correctly)



Your message dated Wed, 14 May 2003 19:11:20 +0200
with message-id <20030514171120.GA16551@preusse-16223.user.cis.dfn.de>
and subject line close
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Apr 2003 22:07:41 +0000
>From swift@alum.mit.edu Wed Apr 16 17:07:41 2003
Return-path: <swift@alum.mit.edu>
Received: from pool-68-160-51-233.bos.east.verizon.net (beth.swift.xxx) [68.160.51.233] (root)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 195v48-0004H3-00; Wed, 16 Apr 2003 17:07:41 -0500
Received: from beth.swift.xxx (swift@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by beth.swift.xxx (8.12.8/8.12.8/Debian-2) with ESMTP id h3GM7WhX004808
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL)
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 16 Apr 2003 18:07:32 -0400
Received: (from swift@localhost)
	by beth.swift.xxx (8.12.8/8.12.8/Debian-2) id h3GM7WaB004806;
	Wed, 16 Apr 2003 18:07:32 -0400
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: tetex-bin: texdoctk not packaged correctly
From: Matt Swift <swift@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 18:07:32 -0400
Message-ID: <m2y92acd0b.fsf@beth.swift.xxx>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090019 (Oort Gnus v0.19) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailscanner: clean	(beth.swift.xxx)
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=4.0
	tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_GNUS_UA
	version=2.44
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: tetex-bin
Version: 2.0.2-1
Severity: normal

The texdoctk binary /usr/bin/texdoctk is in tetex-bin, but it won't
run without the files /etc/texdoctk/texdocrc and
/etc/texdoctk/texdoctk.dat, which are in tetex-extra.

Shouldn't they all be in tetex-doc anyway?

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux beth 2.4.20 #1 Wed Feb 26 02:14:42 EST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8

Versions of packages tetex-bin depends on:
ii  debconf                    1.2.34        Debian configuration management sy
ii  debianutils                2.4.1         Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii  dpkg                       1.10.9        Package maintenance system for Deb
ii  ed                         0.2-20        The classic unix line editor
ii  libc6                      2.3.1-16      GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1                    1:3.2.3-0pre5 GCC support library
ii  libkpathsea3               2.0.2-1       shared libkpathsea for teTeX
ii  libpng12-0                 1.2.5-10      PNG library - runtime
ii  libstdc++5                 1:3.2.3-0pre5 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libwww-ssl0 [libwww0]      5.4.0-6       The W3C-WWW library (SSL support)
ii  libxaw7                    4.2.1-6       X Athena widget set library
ii  perl                       5.8.0-17      Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 
ii  t1lib1                     1.3.1-1       Type 1 font rasterizer library - r
ii  tetex-base                 2.0.2-1       basic teTeX library files
ii  xlibs                      4.2.1-6       X Window System client libraries
ii  zlib1g                     1:1.1.4-11    compression library - runtime

-- debconf information:
* tetex-bin/cnf_name: 
* tetex-bin/groupperm: true
* tetex-bin/lsr-perms: true
* tetex-bin/userperm: false
* tetex-bin/hyphen: greek, italian, latin, portuges, spanish
  tetex-bin/oldcfg: true
* tetex-bin/use_debconf: false
* tetex-bin/groupname: users


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 189341-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 May 2003 17:21:41 +0000
>From hille42@web.de Wed May 14 12:21:32 2003
Return-path: <hille42@web.de>
Received: from smtp03.web.de (smtp.web.de) [217.72.192.158] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 19Fzwa-0001Ke-00; Wed, 14 May 2003 12:21:32 -0500
Received: from [213.7.207.5] (helo=preusse-16223.user.cis.dfn.de)
	by smtp.web.de with asmtp (WEB.DE 4.98 #232)
	id 19Fzw2-0007dG-00
	for 189341-done@bugs.debian.org; Wed, 14 May 2003 19:21:00 +0200
Received: by preusse-16223.user.cis.dfn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 8565A4745; Wed, 14 May 2003 19:11:20 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 19:11:20 +0200
From: Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de>
To: 189341-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: close
Message-ID: <20030514171120.GA16551@preusse-16223.user.cis.dfn.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Organization: Hilmar Preusse Inc.
X-Uptime: 19:07:45 up 5 days, 11:37,  3 users,  load average: 1.01, 1.02, 1.00
X-Operating-System: Linux 2.4.20 i686
X-www.distributed.net: OGR: 5 packets (1388.82 stats units) [2.37 Mnodes/s]
X-Confirmation-Request: yes
X-Confirm-Reading-To: "Hilmar Preusse" <hille42@web.de>
Sender: hille42@web.de
Delivered-To: 189341-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.1 required=4.0
	tests=BAYES_01,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,USER_AGENT_MUTT
	version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

see #190721

H.
-- 
sigmentation fault



Reply to: