Bug#184719: marked as done (tetex-extra: listings.sty (and may be something else) is missing)
Your message dated Mon, 17 Mar 2003 02:48:00 -0500
with message-id <E18upLk-0000OO-00@auric.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#184719: fixed in tetex-base 2.0.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Mar 2003 09:56:26 +0000
>From vitus@mx.cryptocom.ru Fri Mar 14 03:56:26 2003
Return-path: <vitus@mx.cryptocom.ru>
Received: from cryptocom.ipmce.ru (mx.cryptocom.ru) [194.85.185.72]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18tlvM-00026R-00; Fri, 14 Mar 2003 03:56:25 -0600
Received: from lynx (lynx.lan.cryptocom.ru [10.51.17.202])
by mx.cryptocom.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 4E4C31212F; Fri, 14 Mar 2003 12:56:14 +0300 (MSK)
Received: from vitus by lynx with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 18tlvS-0005Iz-00; Fri, 14 Mar 2003 12:56:30 +0300
From: Victor B.Wagner <vitus@cryptocom.ru>
Subject: tetex-extra: listings.sty (and may be something else) is missing
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.1
Message-Id: <[🔎] E18tlvS-0005Iz-00@lynx>
Sender: "Victor B. Wagner" <vitus@lynx>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 12:56:30 +0300
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
Package: tetex-extra
Version: 2.0.1-3
Severity: important
Some very useful LaTeX packages which are used to be included in tetex-extra
package are missing from newer package. Namely listings.sty.
It is now present only in tetex-src package.
Thus either description of tetex-src package (stating that it is not
nesseccary for running TeX system) is incorrect or these files should
be included in some other tetex package
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Kernel Version: Linux lynx 2.4.20-athlon #1 óÒÄ íÁÒ 5 13:01:54 MSK 2003 i686 unknown
Versions of the packages tetex-extra depends on:
ii dpkg 1.9.21 Package maintenance system for Debian
ii gsfonts 6.0-2 Fonts for the ghostscript interpreter
ii perl-tk 800.024-1 Perl module providing the Tk graphics librar
ii tetex-base 2.0.1-3 basic teTeX library files
ii tetex-bin 2.0.1-2.2 teTeX binary files
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 184719-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Mar 2003 07:53:04 +0000
>From katie@auric.debian.org Mon Mar 17 01:53:02 2003
Return-path: <katie@auric.debian.org>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18upQc-0002py-00; Mon, 17 Mar 2003 01:53:02 -0600
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 18upLk-0000OO-00; Mon, 17 Mar 2003 02:48:00 -0500
From: Atsuhito KOHDA <kohda@debian.org>
To: 184719-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.33 $
Subject: Bug#184719: fixed in tetex-base 2.0.2-2
Message-Id: <E18upLk-0000OO-00@auric.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@auric.debian.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 02:48:00 -0500
Delivered-To: 184719-close@bugs.debian.org
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tetex-base, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
tetex-base_2.0.2-2.diff.gz
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_2.0.2-2.diff.gz
tetex-base_2.0.2-2.dsc
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_2.0.2-2.dsc
tetex-base_2.0.2-2_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_2.0.2-2_all.deb
tetex-doc_2.0.2-2_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-doc_2.0.2-2_all.deb
tetex-extra_2.0.2-2_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-extra_2.0.2-2_all.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 184719@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Atsuhito KOHDA <kohda@debian.org> (supplier of updated tetex-base package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 15:58:24 +0900
Source: tetex-base
Binary: tetex-extra tetex-doc tetex-base
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: teTeX maintainers <debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Atsuhito KOHDA <kohda@debian.org>
Description:
tetex-base - basic teTeX library files
tetex-doc - teTeX documentation
tetex-extra - extra teTeX library files
Closes: 172483 184719
Changes:
tetex-base (2.0.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Added cweb examples lost in transition to doc package [jdg]
* Installed web2c/mktex.cnf which I had failed in 2.0.2-1 [kohda]
* Added listings.sty (with patch-tmp) which seemed missing in upstream.
[kohda] (Closes: #184719, #172483)
Files:
70e5fa306f03d755f22efc6e89f66bc6 793 tex optional tetex-base_2.0.2-2.dsc
7bea5ad420b2f3d5c5f368ada02af234 101617 tex optional tetex-base_2.0.2-2.diff.gz
6a82474f1a5a83cc28a1631d0a6e9e8c 13998270 tex optional tetex-base_2.0.2-2_all.deb
94b05647e155628e2ee211624ba92f38 10512858 tex optional tetex-extra_2.0.2-2_all.deb
ecef42cf8712d2e8edc6eb4f1125f3c7 27508594 doc optional tetex-doc_2.0.2-2_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+cu+X1IXdL1v6kOwRArfcAKCNAa5oYIBuXC98fo03TOGs2U3eUgCbBFMc
9TmSPF1YgF70Zl+bnNHxIxI=
=z2YH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: