[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#184558: marked as done (tetex-bin fails to install)



Your message dated Thu, 13 Mar 2003 18:01:01 +0900 (JST)
with message-id <20030313.180101.104034616.kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
and subject line Bug#184558: tetex-bin fails to install
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Mar 2003 04:25:02 +0000
>From jason@pepas.com Wed Mar 12 22:25:02 2003
Return-path: <jason@pepas.com>
Received: from dc-mx02.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.8.12] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18tKH8-0001bJ-00; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 22:25:02 -0600
Received: from [68.118.128.254] (HELO marsala)
  by dc-mx02.cluster1.charter.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5.9)
  with ESMTP id 2637621; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 23:24:31 -0500
Received: from jason by marsala with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 18tKGb-0008MN-00; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 22:24:29 -0600
From: Jason Pepas <jason@pepas.com>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: tetex-bin fails to install
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 22:24:29 -0600
Message-Id: <[🔎] E18tKGb-0008MN-00@marsala>
Sender: Jason Pepas <jason@pepas.com>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=4.0
	tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
	version=2.44
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: tetex-bin
Version: 1.0.7+20011202-8
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

tetex-bin fails to install

(pts/1)root@marsala:~$ apt-get install tetex-bin
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  tetex-bin 
0 packages upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 204  not upgraded.
Need to get 0B/3136kB of archives. After unpacking 7786kB will be used.
Selecting previously deselected package tetex-bin.
(Reading database ... 90715 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking tetex-bin (from .../tetex-bin_1.0.7+20011202-8_i386.deb) ...
Setting up tetex-bin (1.0.7+20011202-8) ...
Generating /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf ... done
Generating /etc/texmf/fmtutil.cnf ... done
kpsewhich: Symbol `kpse_format_info' has different size in shared object, consider re-linking
mktexlsr: Done.
Running initex. This may take some time. ...
kpsewhich: Symbol `kpse_format_info' has different size in shared object, consider re-linking
kpsewhich: Symbol `kpse_format_info' has different size in shared object, consider re-linking
dpkg: error processing tetex-bin (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
 tetex-bin
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)


-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux marsala 2.4.20-ck3 #2 Wed Feb 12 22:12:07 CST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages tetex-bin depends on:
ii  debianutils             1.16.7           Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii  dpkg                    1.10.9           Package maintenance system for Deb
ii  ed                      0.2-19           The classic unix line editor
ii  libc6                   2.3.1-11         GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libkpathsea3            2.0-1            shared libkpathsea for teTeX
ii  libpng3                 1.2.5-10         PNG library - runtime
ii  libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2  1:2.95.4-15      The GNU stdc++ library
ii  libtiff3g               3.5.5-6          Tag Image File Format library
ii  libxaw7                 4.2.1-3          X Athena widget set library
ii  tetex-base              1.0.2+20011202-3 basic teTeX library files
ii  xlibs                   4.2.1-3          X Window System client libraries
ii  zlib1g                  1:1.1.4-6        compression library - runtime


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 184558-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Mar 2003 09:01:12 +0000
>From kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp Thu Mar 13 03:01:12 2003
Return-path: <kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
Received: from nsx.pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp [150.59.48.142] (mail)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18tOaN-0004xR-00; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 03:01:12 -0600
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] ident=kohda)
	by nsx.pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 18tOaI-0003CF-00; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 18:01:06 +0900
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 18:01:01 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <20030313.180101.104034616.kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
To: jason@pepas.com, 184558-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#184558: tetex-bin fails to install
From: Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] E18tKGb-0008MN-00@marsala>
References: <[🔎] E18tKGb-0008MN-00@marsala>
X-Mailer: Mew version 3.2 on Emacs 21.2 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: 184558-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=4.0
	tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
	      SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_01_02
	version=2.44
X-Spam-Level: 

From: Jason Pepas <jason@pepas.com>
Subject: Bug#184558: tetex-bin fails to install
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 22:24:29 -0600

> Selecting previously deselected package tetex-bin.
> (Reading database ... 90715 files and directories currently installed.)
> Unpacking tetex-bin (from .../tetex-bin_1.0.7+20011202-8_i386.deb) ...
> Setting up tetex-bin (1.0.7+20011202-8) ...
> Generating /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf ... done
> Generating /etc/texmf/fmtutil.cnf ... done
> kpsewhich: Symbol `kpse_format_info' has different size in shared object, consider re-linking

This was inconsistency problem of libkpathsea and
already fixed in 2.0.1-2

I don't know why you tried to install an old tetex-bin 
1.0.7+20011202-8 (of stable) though you had installed 

> ii  libkpathsea3            2.0-1            shared libkpathsea for teTeX

(of unstable, which was already obsolete too).

Thanks,			2003-3-13(Thu)

-- 
 Debian Developer & Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian
 Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@debian.org>
 Department of Math., Tokushima Univ.



Reply to: