Bug#182772: marked as done (dvipdfm can't find ot1r.enc)
Your message dated Wed, 05 Mar 2003 09:03:29 +0900 (JST)
with message-id <20030305.090329.41638380.kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
and subject line Bug#182772: dvipdfm can't find ot1r.enc
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Feb 2003 20:04:24 +0000
>From msmakela@pp.inet.fi Thu Feb 27 14:04:24 2003
Return-path: <msmakela@pp.inet.fi>
Received: from smtp.inet.fi [192.89.123.192]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18oUGV-0003WE-00; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 14:04:23 -0600
Received: from p176-9.customer.soneraliving.fi ([62.71.176.9]:32936 "EHLO bim")
by nauta.media.sonera.net with ESMTP id <S6740AbTB0UEV>;
Thu, 27 Feb 2003 22:04:21 +0200
Received: from msmakela by bim with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 18oUGS-0000jV-00
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 22:04:20 +0200
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 22:04:18 +0200
From: Marko =?iso-8859-1?B?TeRrZWzk?= <marko.makela@hut.fi>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: dvipdfm can't find ot1r.enc
Message-ID: <20030227200418.GC457@bim>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Organization: Helsinki University of Technology
Sender: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Marko_M=E4kel=E4?= <msmakela@bim>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,NOSPAM_INC,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 2.0.1-2
Severity: important
The dvipdfm command fails for documents containing ot1r encoded
fonts (especially math fonts), which makes it essentially useless
for processing scientific documents. The old stand-alone dvipdfm
package worked without problems.
The culprit for the failure seems to be a missing file ot1r.enc. The
file appears to be available in dvipdfm-cjk, which cannot be installed.
Here's a minimal example, say, t.tex:
\documentclass{article}\begin{document}test\end{document}
$ latex t
[...]
$ dvipdfm t
t.dvi -> t.pdf
[1
Can't find encoding file: ot1r
Output file removed.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 182772-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Mar 2003 00:03:43 +0000
>From kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp Tue Mar 04 18:03:42 2003
Return-path: <kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
Received: from nsx.pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp [150.59.48.142] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18qMNn-0003lT-00; Tue, 04 Mar 2003 18:03:39 -0600
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] ident=kohda)
by nsx.pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 18qMNh-0002Oz-00; Wed, 05 Mar 2003 09:03:33 +0900
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2003 09:03:29 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <20030305.090329.41638380.kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
To: marko.makela@hut.fi
Cc: 182772-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#182772: dvipdfm can't find ot1r.enc
From: Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
In-Reply-To: <20030304183236.GA352@bim>
References: <20030303091707.GC597@siphon.tcs.hut.fi>
<20030304.084147.41625019.kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
<20030304183236.GA352@bim>
X-Mailer: Mew version 3.2 on Emacs 21.2 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Delivered-To: 182772-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=4.0
tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_02_03
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
From: Marko M=E4kel=E4 <marko.makela@hut.fi>
Subject: Re: Bug#182772: dvipdfm can't find ot1r.enc
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 20:32:37 +0200
> This lead me to examine the file /etc/texmf/dvipfdm/config. How
> embarrassing: I have installed an extra font there, and therefore
> the file was not updated by dpkg. The dvipdfm included in tetex-bin
> does the font mappings differently from the old stand-alone dvipdfm
> package. After I replaced the old mappings with the new "f dvipfdm.m=
ap",
> the problems disappeared.
Okay. It is not so rare that teTeX rearranged structures
etc. of original one.
> I'm very sorry for the bogus bug report. I should have checked the
> config file first. So, the bug can be closed.
Not at all. So I close the bug.
Thanks for your interest in tetex packages.
-- =
Debian Developer & Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian
Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@debian.org>
Department of Math., Tokushima Univ.
Reply to: