[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: CVS kohda tetex-bin: New upstream source



From: teTeX CVS <jdg-tetex-cvs@debian.org>
Subject: CVS kohda tetex-bin: New upstream source
Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2003 15:42:50 -0700

> CVSROOT:	/cvs/tetex
> Module name:	tetex-bin
> Changes by:	kohda	Sat Mar  1 08:42:50 MST 2003
> 
> Modified files:
> 	debian         : changelog 
> 	texk/kpathsea  : texmf.in 
> 	texk/tetex     : Makefile.in 
> Removed files:
> 	.              : CREDITS INSTALL INSTALL.generic LICENSE.src 
> 	                 Makefile.in NEWS PROBLEMS PROBLEMS-teTeX-1.0 
...

Well, I can't understand what happend but it seemed that
cvs-upgrade tetex-bin lost some files unexpectedly.

The strange email was sent to us:

From: teTeX CVS <jdg-tetex-cvs@debian.org>
Subject: CVS kohda tetex-bin: 
Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2003 15:33:56 -0700

> CVSROOT:	/cvs/tetex
> Module name:	tetex-bin
> Changes by:	kohda	Sat Mar  1 08:33:56 MST 2003
> 
> Log message:
> Update of /cvs/tetex/tetex-bin
> In directory gluck:/tmp/cvs-serv29941
> 
> Log Message:
> Imported upstream version 2.0.2. 
> 
> Status:
> 
> Vendor Tag:	source-dist
> Release Tags:	upstream_version_2_0_2
> 		
> U tetex-bin/ChangeLog
> U tetex-bin/texk/dir
> U tetex-bin/texk/README

which kind of email didn't be sent in case tetex-base
nor tetex-bin of 2.0.1, as far as I checked.
(there was no problem at upgrading 2.0 to 2.0.1 and what I did
was the same, I believe ...)

I added lost files afterwards but I'm afraid upgrading
orig source (?) could have been failed.

Anyway, please be careful and sorry if I messed up
CVS repository.

I hope next upgrading will fix this situation.

Best regards,		   2003-3-3(Mon)

-- 
 Debian Developer & Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian
 Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@debian.org>
 Department of Math., Tokushima Univ.



Reply to: