Bug#112942: marked as done (essential.dvi.gz: missing glyph with dvips)
Your message dated Thu, 02 Jan 2003 10:55:04 +0900 (JST)
with message-id <20030102.105504.112606352.kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
and subject line essential.dvi was removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Sep 2001 15:20:51 +0000
>From bonnaud@lis.inpg.fr Thu Sep 20 10:20:51 2001
Return-path: <bonnaud@lis.inpg.fr>
Received: from bacchus.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.21]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15k5dC-0008MN-00; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 10:20:50 -0500
Received: from irancy.lis.inpg.fr (mail@Irancy.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.167])
by bacchus.lis.inpg.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3/cf de Bacchus - 25/05/2000) with ESMTP id RAA10673;
Thu, 20 Sep 2001 17:20:14 +0200
Received: from bonnaud by irancy.lis.inpg.fr with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian))
id 15k5cc-0003Nt-00; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 17:20:14 +0200
From: laurent bonnaud <Laurent.Bonnaud@inpg.fr>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: essential.dvi.gz: missing glyph with dvips
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.28
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.28
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 17:20:13 +0200
Message-Id: <E15k5cc-0003Nt-00@irancy.lis.inpg.fr>
Sender: laurent bonnaud <bonnaud@irancy.lis.inpg.fr>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: tetex-doc
Version: 1.0.2+20000804-9
Severity: normal
Hi,
here is the problem:
$ zcat /usr/share/doc/texmf/latex/general/essential.dvi.gz > /tmp/essential.dvi
$ dvips /tmp/essential.dvi -o /dev/null
This is dvips(k) 5.86d Copyright 1999 Radical Eye Software (www.radicaleye.com)
' TeX output 2000.06.18:2120' -> /dev/null
<texc.pro><8r.enc><texps.pro><special.pro>. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]
[9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20
dvips: Warning: missing glyph `coproduct'
] [21
dvips: Warning: missing glyph `dotlessj'
] [22
dvips: Warning: missing glyph `coproducttext'
] [23] [24] [25] [26]
I don't know if this is a bug in essential.dvi or in dvips.
Curiously, xdvi does not complain.
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux irancy 2.4.9-686 #1 Sun Aug 19 10:46:52 EST 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages tetex-doc depends on:
ii dpkg 1.9.17 Package maintenance system for Deb
ii perl-base [perl5-base] 5.6.1-5 The Pathologically Eclectic Rubbis
ii tetex-base 1.0.2+20000804-9 basic teTeX library files
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 112942-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Jan 2003 01:55:08 +0000
>From kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp Wed Jan 01 19:55:08 2003
Return-path: <kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
Received: from civic.pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp [150.59.48.140] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18TuZf-0007fA-00; Wed, 01 Jan 2003 19:55:08 -0600
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] ident=kohda)
by civic.pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 18TuZe-0005Ga-00; Thu, 02 Jan 2003 10:55:06 +0900
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 10:55:04 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <20030102.105504.112606352.kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
To: 61839-done@bugs.debian.org, 112942-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: essential.dvi was removed
From: Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
X-Mailer: Mew version 3.1 on Emacs 21.2 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: 112942-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0
tests=SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
In tetex-doc 1.0.2+20021025, essential.dvi was removed
fron the upstream so these problems were no more relevant.
Thanks, 2003.1.2(Thu)
--
Debian Developer & Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian
Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@debian.org>
Department of Math., Univ. of Tokushima
Reply to: