Bug#215738: Error: kpsewhich cannot find file fmtutil.cnf
On 14.10.03 Eduard Bloch (edi@gmx.de) wrote:
> Any ideas? I did not change anything, pure upgrading for months now. Now
> latex was broken from one day to another. fmtutil.cnf file is there and
> is readable.
>
> debian:~# apt-get --reinstall install tetex-bin
> Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig
> Abhängigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut... Fertig
> 0 aktualisiert, 0 neu installiert, 1 erneut installiert, 0 zu entfernen und 53 nicht aktualisiert.
> 2 nicht vollständig installiert oder entfernt.
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
2 packages not correctly installed or purged. Are they related to
tetex?
> Es müssen 0B der Archive geholt werden.
> Nach dem Auspacken werden 0B Plattenplatz zusätzlich benutzt.
> Möchten Sie fortfahren? [J/n]
> Lese Changelogs... Fertig
> Setting up tetex-base (2.0.2-4.2) ...
> mktexlsr: /var/lib/texmf/ls-R lacks magic string. Skipping...
> mktexlsr: /var/cache/fonts/ls-R lacks magic string. Skipping...
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
Could you please check, what's up here? If they contain garbage just
remove them and try dpkg-reconfigure tetex-bin.
> warning: kpathsea: No usable entries in /usr/share/texmf/ls-R.
> warning: kpathsea: See the manual for how to generate ls-R.
> warning: kpathsea: No usable entries in /var/cache/fonts/ls-R.
> warning: kpathsea: See the manual for how to generate ls-R.
> Error: kpsewhich cannot find file fmtutil.cnf
>
Might be just an consequence to the error above.
> dpkg: error processing tetex-base (--configure):
> subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
> dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of tetex-bin:
> tetex-bin depends on tetex-base (>= 2.0.2-4.2); however:
> Package tetex-base is not configured yet.
> dpkg: error processing tetex-bin (--configure):
> dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
> Errors were encountered while processing:
> tetex-base
> tetex-bin
> E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
>
H.
--
sigmentation fault
Reply to: