[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#177401: marked as forwarded (tetex-extra: Missing fvrb-ex (fancy verbatim example environments) package)



Your message dated Fri, 15 Aug 2003 00:39:03 +0200
with message-id <20030814223903.GA28739@preusse-16223.user.cis.dfn.de>
has caused the Debian Bug report #177401,
regarding tetex-extra: Missing fvrb-ex (fancy verbatim example environments) package
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) Thomas Esser <te@informatik.uni-hannover.de>.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 177401-forwarded) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Aug 2003 22:50:14 +0000
>From hille42@web.de Thu Aug 14 17:49:48 2003
Return-path: <hille42@web.de>
Received: from smtp02.web.de (smtp.web.de) [217.72.192.151] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 19nQui-0002Fy-00; Thu, 14 Aug 2003 17:49:48 -0500
Received: from [213.7.206.126] (helo=preusse-16223.user.cis.dfn.de)
	by smtp.web.de with asmtp (WEB.DE 4.99 #448)
	id 19nQue-0008Fh-00; Fri, 15 Aug 2003 00:49:47 +0200
Received: by preusse-16223.user.cis.dfn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id C5FD64773; Fri, 15 Aug 2003 00:39:03 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 00:39:03 +0200
From: Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de>
To: Thomas Esser <te@informatik.uni-hannover.de>
Cc: 177401-forwarded@bugs.debian.org
Subject: (fwd) tetex-extra: Missing fvrb-ex (fancy verbatim example environments) package
Message-ID: <20030814223903.GA28739@preusse-16223.user.cis.dfn.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Organization: Hilmar Preusse Inc.
X-Uptime: 00:27:53 up 1 day,  9:54,  4 users,  load average: 1.15, 1.06, 1.15
X-Operating-System: Linux 2.4.21 i686
X-www.distributed.net: OGR: 2 packets (350.35 stats units) [2.29 Mnodes/s]
X-Confirmation-Request: yes
X-Confirm-Reading-To: "Hilmar Preusse" <hille42@web.de>
Sender: hille42@web.de
Delivered-To: 177401-forwarded@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0
	tests=BAYES_20,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_MUTT
	version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Hi Thomas,

http://bugs.debian.org/177401
As usual: a bug report, which should be fixed in upstream.

H.
----- Forwarded message from Gavin Baker <gavinb@antonym.org> -----
From: Gavin Baker <gavinb@antonym.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: tetex-extra: Missing fvrb-ex (fancy verbatim example environments) package
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 22:32:27 +1100
Message-Id: <E18aDgh-0003R3-00@liberator>
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50

Package: tetex-extra
Version: 1.0.2+20011202-3
Severity: normal

The tetex-extra package includes fancyvrb, a fancy verbatim package.
There is an extension to this, called fvrb-ex, which extends the 
fancyvrb to include extra environments and other highly useful things.

The fvrb-ex source _is_ in the tetex-src package, but it is simply not 
built in tetex-extra, along with fancyvrb.  The .dtx file is in the 
source package, and needs to be built into the .sty file in the extra 
package.

Please add fvrb-ex to tetex-extra!

Thanks...

  ::gavin

- -- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux liberator 2.4.17 #4 Wed Apr 10 21:12:17 EST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=

Versions of packages tetex-extra depends on:
ii  dpkg                    1.10.9           Package maintenance system for Deb
ii  gsfonts                 6.0-2.1          Fonts for the ghostscript interpre
ii  tetex-base              1.0.2+20011202-3 basic teTeX library files
ii  tetex-bin               1.0.7+20011202-8 teTeX binary files

----- End forwarded message -----

-- 
sigmentation fault



Reply to: